Understanding Employees’ Strategies for Destructing Managers in Public Organizations

Document Type : مقالات

Authors

• hassan danaeefard ¹
• zinat davoodiyan ²
• hanieh ahmadi ²

¹ tmu

² tarbiat modares

https://doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v8i15.53739

Abstract

1- INTRODUCTION
The concept of deviant workplace behavior has gained attention of organizational scholars because of their destructive effects. These behaviors reduce organizational capacities to realize their planned objectives and consequently decrease organizational productivity and performance. Various types of deviant behavior exist in organization but this research focuses on behaviors done in order to portray public managers in a bad light. Hence, our purpose is identifying employees’ strategies to discredit their managers and not explaining them. In this way, we could assist managers to diagnose such behaviors, reduce them, and improve well-being of their organizations.
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Work place deviant behavior has become an important concern for organizational scholars (Alias & Rasdi, 2015; Kozako, Safin & Rahim 2013). Robinson and Bennett (1995) presented a typology of deviant workplace behavior based on two dimensions (minor-serious, and interpersonal-organizational). Also these behaviors could be positive or negative (Appelbaum, Iaconi & Matousek, 2007). The focus of this research is negative deviant behavior. Actually negative or destructive deviant behaviors violate job description and organizational values (i.e., formal and informal) (Yıldız, 2015).
3- METHODOLOGY
We conducted a mixed method research to identify destructive strategies. In the first phase (i.e., qualitative phase), an interview had been used, whose objective is to explore strategies, and in the second phase (i.e., quantitative phase), a questionnaire had been used to prioritrize strategies based on rate of use. Statistical population consists of employees and managers of public organizations in Semnan including 45 and 70 participants in quantitative and qualitative phases, respectively. Grounded Theory was employed to analyze interviews and Friedman tests were used to accept and prioritize strategies.
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Identified strategies in order of importance are managerial, verbal- communicative, political, and religious, personality, work, performance, and emotional- psychological mechanisms.
5- CONCLUSION & SUGGESTIONS
Future researchers could examine each strategy as a variable and identify antecedents and consequences of it in organizations. Most of these behaviors have phsycological reasons; hence, cooperation of psychologists and organizational scholars is essential for reducing them.

Keywords

• Deviant behaviors
• Destructive strategies
• Political behavior

References

References

Ahmad, A., & Omar, Z. (2014). Reducing Deviant behavior through workplace spirituality and job satisfaction. Asian Social Science, 10(19), 107-112.

Appelbaum, S. H.; Iaconi, G. D., & Matousek, A. (2007). Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: Causes, impact, and solutions. Corporate Governance, 7(5), 86-598.

Appelbaum, S. H.; Shapiro, B. T., & Molson, J. (2006). Diagnosis and remedies for deviant workplace behaviors. Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(2), 14-20.

Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence, and deviance in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 954-962.

Colbert, A. E.; Mount, M. K.; Harter, J. K.; Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 599-609.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Danaeefard, H. (2008). Accommodation quantitative and qualitative in organizational researches: A reflection on mixed method strategies. Methodology of Social Sciences, 13(53), 63-35. (in Persian)

Demir, M. (2011). Effects of organizational justice, trust and commitment on employees' deviant behavior. Anatolia, 22(2), 204-221.

Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004). Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: the bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 67-80.

Everton, W. J.; Jolton, J. A., & Mastrangelo, P. M. (2007). Be nice and fair or else: understanding reasons for employees' deviant behaviors. Journal of Management Development, 26(2), 117-131.

Galperin, B. L. (2002). Determinants of deviance in the workplace: An empirical examination of Canada and Mexico. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.

Galperin, B. L., & Burke, R. J. (2006). Uncovering the relationship between workaholism and workplace destructive and constructive deviance: An exploratory study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 331-347.

Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial behavior in organizations. Sage Publications, Incorporated.

Griffin, R. W., & Lopez, Y. P. (2005). “Bad behavior” in organizations: A review and typology for future research. Journal of Management, 31(6), 988-1005.

Henle, C. A.; Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3), 219-230.

Hershcovis, M. S.; Turner, N.; Barling, J.; Arnold, K. A.; Dupre, K. E.; Inness, M., & Sivanathan, N. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 92(1), 228-238.

Hussain, I.; Sia, S. K., & Mishra, P. K. (2014). Workplace deviance and the menace of some antecedents: A review of extant literature. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 5(7), 13-20.

Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2007). Ain't misbehavin: workplace deviance as organizational resistance. Journal of Management, 33(3), 378-394.

Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 558-578.

Mangione, T. W., & Quinn, R. P. (1974). Job satisfaction, counterproductive behavior, and drug use at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 114-116.

Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159-1168.

O’Neill, T. A.; Lewis, R. J., & Carswell, J. J. (2011). Employee personality, justice perceptions, and the prediction of workplace deviance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 595-600.

Peterson, D. K. (2002). Deviant workplace behavior and the organization's ethical climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 47-61.

Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572.

Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1997). Workplace deviance: Its definition, its manifestations, and its causes. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 6, 3-27.

Robinson, S. L.; Wang, W., & Kiewitz, C. (2014). Coworkers behaving badly: the impact of coworker deviant behavior upon individual employees. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav, 1(1), 123-143.

Salmani, D., & Radmand, M. (2009). Examining the role of work organization and management of deviant behavior, Public Administration, 1(3), 51-68. (in Persian)

Sarmad, Z.; Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2001). Research methodologies in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Agah publications. (in Perasin)

Simard, M.; St-Sauveur, C.; LeBrock, P.; Lafrenière, A.; Leblanc, G., & Duval, M. (2004). Verification of an integrative model of antisocial workplace behaviour. Psychol Travail Organ, 10, 74-87.

Yen, C. H., & Teng, H. Y. (2013). The effect of centralization on organizational citizenship behavior and deviant workplace behavior in the hospitality industry. Tourism Management, 36, 401-410.

Warren, D. E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 622-632.

Vadera, A. K.; Pratt, M. G., & Mishra, P. (2013). Constructive deviance in organizations integrating and moving forward. Journal of Management, 0149206313475816.

Vardi, Y. (2001). The effects of organizational and ethical climates on misconduct at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4), 325-337.