نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد، مدیریت دولتی، گرایش توسعه منابع انسانی، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه مدیریت اسلامی، پژوهشکده مطالعات اسلامی در علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده

در عصر کنونی که سازمان­ها با محیط رقابتی جهانی روبه­رو هستند، نیاز به خلاقیت­ به‌شدت در فضای کاری احساس می‌شود. سازمان­ها برای حرکت در این مسیر پر از چالش و بقا در این فضای رقابتی نباید بر شیوه­های قدیمی که قادر به پاسخگویی به نیازهای حال حاضر سازمان نیست پافشاری کرده و باید از شیوه­های خلاقانه برای انجام کارها در سازمان استفاده کنند. رهبری متناقض‌نما، یکی از سبک­های نوین رهبری که می­تواند بر خلاقیت کارکنان تأثیرگذار باشد، از چالش­هایی است که مدیران در فضای کاری خود با آن مواجه هستند. تحقیق حاضر ازنظر هدف کاربردی است و به لحاظ ماهیت و روش نیز توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی-تحلیلی است. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه بوده و جامعه آماری تحقیق نیز، کارکنان سازمان­های دولتی در شهر مشهد هستند. برای تعیین حجم نمونه برای هر گویه 10 پرسشنامه در نظر گرفته شد که بعد از حذف پرسشنامه­های ناقص، داده­های موردنیاز از 384 نفر به روش تصادفی طبقه­ای جمع­آوری گردید. برازندگی داده­ها با بررسی شاخص­های روایی و پایایی ابزار جمع­آوری داده، تأیید شده سپس به­منظور بررسی میزان اثرگذاری متغیرها و آزمون فرضیه­های مربوطه از تکنیک مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. درنهایت داده­های جمع‌آوری شده با استفاده از تکنیک­های آماری تجزیه‌وتحلیل شدند. تمامی فرضیات تحقیق موردسنجش قرار گرفته و تأثیر مثبت رهبری متناقض‌نما بر هویت‌یابی با رهبر و خودکارآمدی خلاقانه، خودکارآمدی خلاقانه بر خلاقیت کارکنان، هویت‌یابی با رهبر بر خلاقیت کارکنان تأیید شد. همچنین نقش میانجی­گر خودکارآمدی خلاقانه و هویت‌یابی با رهبر در میان فرضیات اثبات شده و فرضیات تعدیل‌گر فشار حجم کار با ضریب تأثیر مثبت و نیاز کارکنان به ثبات شناختی با ضریب تأثیر منفی نیز مورد تأیید قرار گرفت و در پایان نیز پیشنهاد‌هایی برای تحقیقات آتی ارائه شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School.‏
Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: an interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological review109(4), 619.‏
Anderson, N.; Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of management40(5), 1297-1333.‏
Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of marketing research33(2), 174-187.‏
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization science20(4), 696-717.‏
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review14(1), 20-39.‏
Bakker, A. B.; Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands‐resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management43(1), 83-104.‏
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review84(2), 191.‏
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of personality and social psychology42(1), 116.‏
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of management review11(3), 618-634.‏
Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of applied psychology94(3), 654.‏
El Shikieri, A. B., & Musa, H. A. (2012). Factors associated with occupational stress and their effects on organizational performance in a Sudanese University. Creative Education3(01), 134.‏
Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of management journal40(4), 988-1010.‏
Farmer, S. M.; Tierney, P., & Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of management Journal46(5), 618-630.‏
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management review21(4), 1112-1142.‏
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management review17(2), 183-211.‏
Gong, Y.; Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of management Journal52(4), 765-778.‏
Gu, Q.; Tang, T. L. P., & Jiang, W. (2015). Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader–member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. Journal of business ethics126, 513-529.‏
Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological review64(2), 110.‏
Hirst, G.; Van Knippenberg, D.; Chen, C. H., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of management journal54(3), 624-641.‏
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and social psychology review5(3), 184-200.‏
Jung, K. B.; Kang, S. W., & Choi, S. B. (2022). Paradoxical leadership and involvement in creative task via creative self-efficacy: a moderated mediation role of task complexity. Behavioral Sciences12(10), 377.‏
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind:" Seizing" and" freezing.". Psychological review103(2), 263.‏
Lang, J.; Thomas, J. L.; Bliese, P. D., & Adler, A. B. (2007). Job demands and job performance: the mediating effect of psychological and physical strain and the moderating effect of role clarity. Journal of occupational health psychology12(2), 116.‏
Liang, J.; Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management journal55(1), 71-92.‏
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of management24(1), 43-72.‏
Liu, W.; Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The leadership quarterly21(1), 189-202.‏
Miron-Spektor, E., & Beenen, G. (2015). Motivating creativity: The effects of sequential and simultaneous learning and performance achievement goals on product novelty and usefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes127, 53-65.‏
Moeini, B.; Shafii, F.; Hidarnia, A.; Babaii, G. R.; Birashk, B., & Allahverdipour, H. (2008). Perceived stress, self-efficacy and its relations to psychological well-being status in Iranian male high school students. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal36(2), 257-266.‏
Moideenkutty, U.; Blau, G.; Kumar, R., & Nalakath, A. (2001). Perceived organisational support as a mediator of the relationship of perceived situational factors to affective organisational commitment. Applied Psychology50(4), 615-634.‏
Müceldili, B.; Turan, H., & Erdil, O. (2013). The influence of authentic leadership on creativity and innovativeness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences99, 673-681.‏
Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human resource management review10(3), 313-351.‏
Nijstad, B. A.; De Dreu, C. K.; Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European review of social psychology21(1), 34-77.‏
Reid, E., & Ramarajan, L. (2016). Managing the high intensity workplace. Harvard Business Review94(6), 84-90.‏
Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and individual differences50(1), 90-94.‏
Sacramento, C. A.; Fay, D., & West, M. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational behavior and human decision processes121(2), 141-157.‏
Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2008). How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organization Science19(6), 807-823.‏
Sluss, D. M.; Ployhart, R. E.; Cobb, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2012). Generalizing newcomers' relational and organizational identifications: Processes and prototypicality. Academy of Management Journal55(4), 949-975.‏
Smith, J. A., & Foti, R. J. (1998). A pattern approach to the study of leader emergence. The Leadership Quarterly9(2), 147-160.‏
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management Review36(2), 381-403.‏
Sowden, P. T.; Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2015). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory. Thinking & reasoning21(1), 40-60.‏
Shalley, C. E.; Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of management30(6), 933-958.‏
Shamir, B. (1995). Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly6(1), 19-47.‏
Shao, Y.; Nijstad, B. A., & Täuber, S. (2019). Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes155, 7-19.‏
She, Z.; Li, Q.; Yang, B., & Yang, B. (2020). Paradoxical leadership and hospitality employees’ service performance: The role of leader identification and need for cognitive closure. International Journal of Hospitality Management89, 102524.‏
Shiu, S. C.; Lin, S. Y., & Chien, H. O. (2012). The relationship between learning motivation and innovative behavior in the university students: From the perspective of creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Arts & Sciences5(5), 33.‏
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal45(6), 1137-1148.‏
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of management30(3), 413-432.‏
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of applied psychology96(2), 277.‏
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Non-test ways of identifying the creatively gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly6(3), 71-75.‏
Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Schie, E. C. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology73(2), 137-147.‏
Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in organizational behavior25(2), 243-295.‏
Van Knippenberg, D.; Van Knippenberg, B.; De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly15(6), 825-856.‏
Voydanoff, P. (2005). Work demands and work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: Direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Family Issues26(6), 707-726.‏
Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader. Academy of Management Perspectives30(3), 316-327.‏
Walumbwa, F. O., & Hartnell, C. A. (2011). Understanding transformational leadership–employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self‐efficacy. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology84(1), 153-172.‏
Wayne, S. J.; Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management journal40(1), 82-111.‏
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of personality and social psychology67(6), 1049.‏
Zhang, Y.; Waldman, D. A.; Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of management journal58(2), 538-566.‏
Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology83(2), 261.‏
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. Research in personnel and human resources management, 165-217.‏
Zhu, W.; He, H.; Treviño, L. K.; Chao, M. M., & Wang, W. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower voice and performance: The role of follower identifications and entity morality beliefs. The Leadership Quarterly26(5), 702-718.‏
CAPTCHA Image