نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت آموزشی گروه علوم تربیتی دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان، ایران.
2 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
چکیده
امروزه دانشگاه‌ها و مؤسسات آموزش عالی به‌منظور به اشتراک‌گذاری دانش و نوآوری‌های خود و صنایع به‌منظور کسب نوآوری‌های تولید شده توسط دانشگاه از استراتژی مرزگستری بهره می‌گیرند و از این طریق نیازهای یکدیگر را تأمین می‌نمایند؛ بنابراین ارتباط تنگاتنگی بین مرزگستری و نوآوری شکل می‌گیرد. ازاین‌رو هدف این پژوهش واکاوی نقش مرزگستری در نوآوری سازمانی با رویکرد فراتحلیل بود. پژوهش از نوع مطالعات کمی بود که با استفاده از روش فراتحلیل انجام شد. جامعه موردبررسی، پژوهشهای منتشرشده به زبان انگلیسی در سالهای 2015 تا 2023 در پایگاههای علمی بود. در این پژوهش، از میان 189 مطالعه در زمینه تأثیر مرزگستری در نوآوری سازمانی، تعداد 18 مطالعه با توجه به معیارهای ورود و خروج مدنظر پژوهشگران انتخاب و اطلاعات کمی آن‌ها (اندازه اثر مرزگستری بر نوآوری سازمانی)، وارد تحلیل نهایی شد. تحلیل داده‌ها با نرمافزار CMA 3 و با استفاده از آزمون‌ها و روش‌های اندازه اثر، روش رگرسیون خطی اِیگر، همبستگی رتبهای بگ و مزومدار و آزمون Q انجام شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد؛ میانگین اندازه اثر مرزگستری (اثرات ترکیبی تصادفی) بر نوآوری سازمانی در نمونه پژوهش معادل 347/0 است که این مقدار بر مبنای معیار کوهن در حد متوسط به بالا است؛ بنابراین می‌توان گفت مرزگستری در سطح متوسط بر نوآوری سازمانی تأثیر دارد. همچنین یافته‌ها نشان داد متغیر سال انجام پژوهش و کشور محل انجام پژوهش می‌توانند در رابطه بین مرزگستری و نوآوری سازمانی نقش تعدیل‌کنندگی ایفا کند. به‌طورکلی سازمان‌ها و صنایع جهت کسب نوآوری تولید شده در دانشگاه‌ها می‌توانند از استراتژی مرزگستری استفاده نمایند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Acharya, Ch.; Ojha, D.; Gokhale, R., & Patel, P. C. (2022). Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability: The role of boundary spanning objects, International Journal of Information Management, 62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102438.
Adams, K. R. (2014). The Exploration of Community Boundary Spanners in University–Community Partnerships. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(3), 113-118.
Alharbi, I.; Jamil, R., Mahmood, N.; & Shaharoun, A. (2019). Organizational Innovation: A Review Paper. Open Journal of Business and Management, 7, 1196-1206. doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2019.73084.
Al-Omoush, Kh.; Simón-Moya., & Javier Sendra-García, J. (2020). The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 279-288.
Bazrafshan, A.; Hejazi, R.; Rahmani, A., & Bastani, S. (2015). Meta-analysis of Audit Committee Independence and Financial Reporting Quality. Management Accounting, 8(25), 101-117. (In Persian)
Bednarek, A. T.; Wyborn, C.; Cvitanovic, C.; Meyer, R.; Colvin, R. M.; Addison, P. F. E.; Close, K.; Curran, S. L.; Farooque, M.; Goldman, E.; Hart, D.; Mannix, H.; McGreavy, B.; Parris, A.; Posner, S.; Robinson, C.; Ryan, M., & Leith, P. (2018). Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives. Sustain Sci, 13, 1175–1183.
Bruneel, J.; D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Res Policy 39(7), 858–868.
Cao, N.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y., & Yu, L. (2021). Towards Enterprise Sustainable Innovation Process: Through Boundary-Spanning Search and Capability Reconfiguration. Processes, 9, 2092.
Chryssou. C. E. (2020). University-industry interactions in the Sultanate of Oman: challenges and opportunities. Ind High Educ, 34(5), 342–357.
Colien, I. (2021). Concepts of power in boundary spanning research: A review and research agenda. LJMR, 23(4), 443-465.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature, Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-119.
Dutta. S.; Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2020). Global innovation index 2020: Who will finance innovation? 13th edn. Cornell University, INSEAD and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO); Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva.
Engesbak, V., & Ingvaldsen, J. A. (2019). Please Use Our Ideas: Making Parallel Organizations Work. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 26(3/4), 183–195.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23.
Fang, Y.; Dai, X.; & Zhang, X. (2021). An empirical study of the relationship between inclusive leadership and business model innovation, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(3), 480-494.
Figueiredo, N., & Fernandes, C. (2020). Cooperation university-industry: a systematic literature review. Int J Innov Technol, 17(8), 2130001.
Ghrobani Zadeh, V. A., & Hassan Nanghir, S. T. (2013). Practical guide of meta-analysiswith CMA2 software. Tehran: Sociologists Publications. (In Persian)
Grawe, S. J.; Daughterty, P. J., & Ralston, P. M. (2015). Enhancing Dyadic Performance through Boundary Spanners and Innovation: An Assessment of Service Provider-Customer Relationships. Journal of Business Logistics. 36(1); 88-101.
Grygoruk, M., & Rannow, S. (2017). Mind the gap! Lessons from science-based stakeholder dialogue in climate-adapted management of wetlands. Journal of Environmental Management, Part 1, 186, 108-119.
Gunday, G.; Ulusoy, G.; Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of production economics. 133(2), 662-676.
Guo, Z.; Heidl, R. A.; Hollenbeck, J. R.; Yu, A., & Howe, M. (2022). When discretionary boundary spanning relationships cease becoming discretionary: The impact of closed ties on informal leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(6), 898–916.
Hogg, M. A.; Van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. (2012). Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading Across Group and Organizational Boundaries. The Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 232-255.
Hoogstraaten, M. J.; Frenken, K., & Boon, W. P. C. (2020). The study of institutional entrepreneurship and its implications for transition studies, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 114-136.
Hu, P.; Wang, Y.; Feng, T., & Duan, Y. (2021). Innovative search, capability reconfiguration and firm innovation performance in the process of technological leapfrogging. Chinese Management Studies, 15(5), 961-984.
Jansen, J. J.; Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W., (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
Keszey, T. (2018). Boundary spanners’ knowledge sharing for innovation success in turbulent times, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(5), 1061-1081.
Kim, S. L.; Lee, D., & Yun, S. (2022). Leader boundary-spanning behavior and creative behavior: the role of need for status and creative self-efficacy, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 835-846.
Kislov, R.; Hyde, P., & McDonald, R. (2017). New Game, Old Rules? Mechanisms and Consequences of Legitimation in Boundary Spanning Activities. 38(10), 1421-1444.
Knifer, K.; Schreiner, E.; Schmid, E., & Peus, C. (2018). The performance of pre-founding entrepreneurial teams: the importance of learning and leadership. Applied Psychology, 67(3), 401-427.
Lander, B. (2015). Boundary-spanning in academic healthcare organizations. Research Policy, 45(8), 1524-1533.
Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2014). A field-of-practice view of boundary-spanning in and across organizations. In G. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence and conflict. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Liu, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, X., & Zhang, N. (2022). Top management team boundary-spanning leadership: Measurement development and its impact on innovative behavior. Front. Psychol. 13:988771.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988771
McNiven, A.; Boulton, M.; Locock, L., & Hinton, L. (2021). Boundary spanning and identity work in the clinical research delivery workforce: a qualitative study of research nurses, midwives and allied health professionals in the National Health Service, United Kingdom. Health Res Policy Sys, 19(74). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00722-0
Mull, C. D. (2014). Boundary-Spanning Behaviors of Individuals Engaged with. The U.S. Military Community,
Perez-Lu´no, A.; Gopalakrishnan, Sh., & Valle Cabrera, R. (2014). Innovation and Performance: The Role of Environmental Dynamism on the Success of Innovation Choices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
Romero-Hidalgo, J. A.; Isiordia-Lachica, P. C.; Valenzuela, A., & Rodríguez-Carvajal, R. A. (2021). Knowledge and Innovation Management Model in the Organizational Environment. Information. 12(6), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12060225
Rossoni, A. L.; de Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & de Castilho Rossoni, R. L. (2023). Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. Manag Rev Q. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1
Russell, R.; Chung, M., & Balk, E. M. (2009). Issues and Challenges in Conducting Systematic Reviews to Support Development of Nutrient Reference Values: Workshop Summary: Nutrition Research Series, 2. Technical Reviews, 17(2)0-0.
Samimi, M.; Cortes, A. F.; Anderson, M. H., & Herrmann, P. (2020). What is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 101353. Doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101353
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company, New York.
Van Lancker, J.; Mondelaers, K.; Wauters, E., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2015). The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level. Technovation, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.008i
Van Meerkerk, I. (2014). Boundary spanning in governance networks: a study about the role of boundary spanners and their effects on democratic throughput legitimacy and performance of governance networks. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Van Meerkerk, I., & Edelenbos, J. (2018). Facilitating conditions for boundary-spanning behavior in governance networks, Public Management Review, 20(4), 503-524.
Widmann, A., & Mulder, R. H. (2018). Team learning behaviours and innovative work behaviour in work teams, European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 501-520.
Williams, P. (2010). Special Agents: The Nature and Role of Boundary Spanners. (Presentation ESRC research seminars series - Collaborative Futures: New insights from intra and inter-sectoral collaborations). University of Birmingham. Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/43248650-Special-agents-the-nature-and-role-of-boundaryspanners.html
Yang, H. (2018). Boundary spanners in university−school district partnerships. a dissertation presented to the Department of Leadership Studies and the Graduate School of University of Central Arkansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interdisciplinary Leadership Studies, Conway, Arkansas
Yang, H.; Phelps, C., & Steensma, H. (2010). Learning from what others have learned from you: the effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 371-389.
Yang, W.; Wu, Z., & Wu, B. (2016). Empirical Research on the Impacts of Geographic Boundary-spanning Search on Innovation Performance. WHICEB 2016 Proceedings. 27.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/whiceb2016/27
Yu, B.; Hao, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Organizational search and business model innovation: the moderating role of knowledge inertia, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(7), 1705-1718.
Ze, R.; Kun, Z.; Boadu, F., & Yu, L. (2018). The Effects of Boundary-Spanning Search, Network Ties, and Absorptive Capacity for Innovation: A Moderated Mediation Examination. Sustainability, 10, 3980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113980
Zhang, H.; Tan, X.; Liu, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Do Team BoundarySpanning Activities Affect Innovation Performance? Sustainability, 15, 10605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310605
Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Guo, J., & Jiang, R. (2020). The interactive effects of individual boundary spanning and boundary buffering when using enterprise social media, International Journal of Information Management, 64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102490.
Zhang, Q., & Li, J. (2021). Can employee's boundary-spanning behavior exactly promote innovation performance? The roles of creative ideas generation and team task interdependence, International Journal of Manpower, 42(6), 1047-1063.
Zheng, Z., & Ahmed, R. I. (2022). Humble leadership and employee creative performance in China: the roles of boundary spanning behavior and traditionality, Personnel Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi-org.librarylogin-cupey.uagm.edu/10.1108/PR-10-2021-0775
Zhu, J.; Xin, L., & Li, M. (2023). How and when is boundary-spanning behaviour related to innovative behaviour: role of intrinsic motivation and organisational support. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2022-0608
Zhu, J.; Xu, Sh.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, B.; Xu, F., & Zong, B. (2020). The cross-level double-edged-sword effect of boundary-spanning behavior on creativity. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(11), 1340-1351.
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله