نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه مدیرت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران،ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران
چکیده
توهم توطئه در مدیران باعث میشود تصور کنند کارکنان مخفیانه و با داشتن سوءنیت به دنبال دسیسهچینی و تحقق اهداف خودخواهانه هستند که بروز این پدیده منجر به افزایش بدبینی نسبت به کارکنان و ترومای سازمانی میشود. ازاین‌رو شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر توهم توطئه مدیران در سازمانهای دولتی و رفع آن‌ها منجر به تسهیل مسیر توسعه و تحول سازمانی میشود. براین اساس هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی و سطحبندی پیشرانهای توهم توطئه مدیران است. شناسایی پیشرانهای توهم توطئه از طریق مصاحبههای نیمهساختاریافته با روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی بر پایه تکنیک اشباع نظری با 15 نفر از اساتید مدیریت و روانشناسی انجام گرفت. روایی و پایایی مصاحبهها به ترتیب با روش روایی محتوایی نسبی و شاخص کاپای کوهن تأیید شد. کدگذاری مصاحبهها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار اطلستی منجر به شناسایی 11 پیشران در شکلگیری توهم توطئه شد. به‌منظور سطحبندی پیشرانهای شناسایی شده از نظرات 26 نفر از مدیران ارشد سازمانهای دولتی استان آذربایجانغربی با روش نمونهگیری هدفمند و به کمک پرسشنامه استفاده شد. روایی و پایایی پرسشنامه به ترتیب با بهرهگیری از روایی محتوا و روش آزمون ـ پسآزمون تأیید شد. پیشرانهای شناسایی شده با روش ساختاری تفسیری منجر به تشکیل شش سطح شد که ضعف فرهنگی و ضعف مدیریتی مدیران اثرگذارترین و عدم شفافیت و ارتباطات ناکارآمد، اثرپذیرترین عوامل بودند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
References
Attri, R.; Dev, N., & Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 23(19), 11-71.
Azar, A., & Bayat, K. (2008). Business central process model design with interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Information Technology Management Quarterly, 1(1), 3-18. (in Persian).
Baden, C., & Sharon, T. (2021). Blinded by the lies? Toward an integrated definition of conspiracy theories. Communication Theory, 31(1), 82-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa023
Biddlestone, M.; Cichocka, A., Žeželj, I., & Bilewicz, M. (2020). Conspiracy theories and intergroup relations. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-2_6
Bilewicz, M.; Cichocka, A., & Soral, W. (2015). The psychology of conspiracy. Routledge.
Cichocka, A.; Marchlewska, M.; Golec de Zavala, A., & Olechowski, M. (2016). ‘They will not control us’: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 556-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12158
Cuddy, A. J.; Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631-648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
De Moura, G. R.; Abrams, D.; Retter, C.; Gunnarsdottir, S., & Ando, K. (2009). Identification as an organizational anchor: how identification and job satisfaction combine to predict turnover intention. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 540-557. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.553
Douglas, K. M.; Cichocka, A., & Sutton, R. M. (2020). Motivations, emotions and belief in conspiracy theories. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, 181-191. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-2_3
Douglas, K. M., & Leite, A. C. (2017). Suspicion in the workplace: Organizational conspiracy theories and work-related outcomes. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 486-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12212
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2015). Climate change: why the conspiracy theories are dangerous. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(2), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215571908
Douglas, K. M.; Sutton, R. M.; Callan, M. J.; Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2015). Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586
Douglas, K. M.; Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories. The Social Psychology of Gullibility, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203787-4
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2015). Qualitative content analysis. Content Analysis, 81-120. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.003.0004
Goreis, A., & Voracek, M. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Goertzel, T. (2010). Conspiracy theories in science. EMBO reports, 11(7), 493–499. http://doi:10.1038/ embor.2010.84
Hagen, K. (2017). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style: do conspiracy theories posit implausibly vast and evil conspiracies? Social Epistemology, 32(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1352625
Hancock, J. I.; Allen, D. G.; Bosco, F. A.; McDaniel, K. R., & Pierce, C. A. (2011). Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. Journal of Management, 39(3), 573-603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311424943
Hofstadter, R., & Eysenck, H. J. (1966). The Paranoid style in american politics and other essays.by richard hofstadter. Political Science Quarterly, 81(4), 645. https://doi.org/10.2307/2146916
Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs as psycho-political reactions to perceived power. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, 192-205. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-2_4
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2013). The social consequences of conspiracism: exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018
Jolley, D.; Meleady, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2019). Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups. British Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12385
Lantian, A.; Wood, M., & Gjoneska, B. (2020). Personality traits, cognitive styles and worldviews associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, 155-167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452734-2_1
McCauley, C., & Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: a bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(5), 637-644.
Meyer, J. P.; Becker, T. E., & Van Dick, R. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 665-683. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.383
Miller, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories: Public arguments as coded social critiques: a rhetorical analysis of the twa flight 800 conspiracy theories. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39(1), 40-56.
Oliver, J. E.; & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid Style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952-966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
Rankin, J. (2017). The conspiracy theory meme as a tool of cultural hegemony: A critical discourse analysis. PhD dissertation. fielding graduate university. santa barbara. CA.
Schwepker, C. H. (2001). Ethical climate's relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the salesforce. Journal of Business Research, 54(1), 39-52.
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227.
Swami, V.; Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: a preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749 761. http://doi:10.1002/acp.1583
Swami, V., & Coles, R. (2010). The truth is out there: belief in conspiracy theories. the psychologist, 23. 560–563.
Swami, V.; Coles, R.; Stieger, S.; Pietschnig, J.; Furnham, A.; Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in britain and austria: evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443-463.
Van Dick, R.; Christ, O.; Stellmacher, J.; Wagner, U.; Ahlswede, O.; Grubba, C.; Hauptmeier, M.; Hohfeld, C.; Moltzen, K., & Tissington, P. A. (2004). Should I stay or should I go? explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15(4), 351-360.
Van Prooijen, J., & De Vries, R. E. (2016). Organizational conspiracy beliefs: implications for leadership styles and employee outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(4), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9428-3
Van Prooijen, J., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 897-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2530
Van Prooijen, J., & Jostmann, N. B. (2012). Belief in conspiracy theories: the influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922
Van Prooijen, J., & Song, M. (2021). The cultural dimension of intergroup conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 112(2), 455-473. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12471
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115-117.
Wood, M. J. (2016). Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 507-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12231
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله