A phenomenology study on situational antecedents of behavioral resistance to organizational change

Document Type : مقالات

Authors

• Mostafa Hadavinejad
• Hafez Ramazani

Vali-e-Asr University

https://doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v8i16.58008

Abstract

1- INTRODUCTION
One of the main causes of organizational change failure is employees’ resistance to change (Padro de Val & Fuentes, 2003). Because of abstract and multidimensional nature of resistance to change, it has been paid attention to it from diverse aspects (Piderit, 2000). The orthodoxy, however, is behavioral kind of attitudinal approach to resistance to change (Ashforth & Mael, 1998). Since, in its turn, behavioral resistance has different types (Yue, 2008), developing studies to explore the effective factors on them is necessary. In this regard, the purpose of this study is exploring the situational antecedents of behavioral types of resistance to change based on a phenomenology.
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
There are different approaches to studying the phenomenon of resistance to change: dispositional, political, deconstructive, and attitudinal (Hadavinejad & Tamaddon, 2014). Based on attitudinal approach, besides cognitive and affective aspects, resistance to change have behavioral aspect too. In its preliminary and simple form, the behavioral resistance is a kind of overt-conscious opposite reaction to change from protesters. However, it can be more complex based on overt-covert and conscious-unconscious dimensions. So, in addition to protesters, the other behavioral resistant employees are saboteurs, survivors, and zombies (O'Connor, 1993). Although, the dispositional antecedents of these kinds of behavioral resistance have been explored heretofore (Hadavinejad & Tamaddon, 2014), the presented study is devoted to exploring the situational ones.
3- METHODOLOGY
Delimited to attitudinal approach in resistance to change, data gathered through lived experiences of 18 top managers of administrative organizations in Rafsanjan, I.R. of Iran, in the framework of hermeneutic phenomenology, based on typical sampling up to theoretical saturation. Data analyzed based on Diekelmann et al. (1989) proposed process using Maxqda software. In order to gain confidence from data reliability, its credibility, transferability, dependability, and conformability were checked.
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Diverse themes were explored through preliminary data codifying and reduced to macro themes in an iterative process. Findings showed that the situational context facilitates sabotage are authoritarian leadership style, perceived organizational injustice, and weakness of appraisal assessment and reward systems. Weakness of appraisal assessment, staffing, and training systems, job ambiguity and role overload are situational factors affecting survivors, too. The protesters behave in a context included of democratic leadership style, perceived organizational injustice, perceived organizational nonsupport, and weakness of appraisal assessment, reward, and notification systems. Finally, the main situational antecedents of zombies’ behavioral resistanc to change are weakness of training, staffing, and notification systems.
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
Based on findings, reinforcement of reward system beside effort to reduce injustice and improve organizational support can lead to decrease of employees’ conscious behavioral resistance to change in Rafsanjan administrative organizations. Moreover, changing the leadership style from authoritarian to democratic may reduce sabotage, as well as, improving notification system that can decrease protests toward change. Since, it is concluded that weakness of appraisal assessment system would effects all types of behavioral resistance to change, except zombie, improving mentioned system would cause protesters, saboteurs, and survivors be diminished in organization. In order to manage the unconscious resistance, it is necessary to improve the staffing and training systems. However, promoting the notification system beside two prior systems would lead to reduction in zombie behavioral resistance to change. Whereas, to decrease the survivors’ resistance, it is recommended the job ambiguity and role overload be disappeared.

Keywords

• Organizational change
• Resistance to change
• Behavioral resistance
• Situational antecedents
• Hermeneutic phenomenology

References

References

Appelbaum, S. H.; St-Pierre, N., & Glavas, W. (1998). Strategic organizational change: the role of leadership, learning, motivation and productivity. Management Decision, 36(5), 289-301.

Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: a review of theory and research in the 1990’s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-315.

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1998). The power of resistance: Sustaining valued identities. In R. M. Kramer, & M. A. Neale (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations (pp. 89-120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bargh, J., & Williams, L. (2007). The nonconscious regulation of emotion. In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 429–445), New York: Guilford Press.

Brower, R., & Abolafia, M. (1995). The structural embeddedness of resistance among public managers. Group and Organization Management, 20(2), 149-166.

Cobb, A. T.; Wooten, K. C., & Folger, R. (1995). Justice in the making: Toward understanding the theory and practice of justice in organizational change and development. in W. A. Pasmore, & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in Organizational change and development: 8 (pp. 243-295). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Lincoln: Sage, London.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.

Cropanzano, R. (1995). Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace. ABC-CLIO, Westport, Conn: Quorum Books.

Danaeefard, H., & Kazemi, H. (2011). Interprative research in organization: Phenomonology and phenomenography strategies. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University Publication. (in Persian).

Diekelmann, N.; Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (1989). The national league for nursing criteria for appraisal of baccalaureate programs: a critical hermeneutic analysis. in L. Moody & M. Shannon (Eds.), NLN nursing research monograph series (pp. 11-34), New York: NLN Press.

Eisenberger, R.; Armeli, S.; Rexwinkel, B.; Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organization support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51.

Eisenberger, R.; Huntington, R.; Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.

Erwin, D. G., & Garman, A. N. (2010). Resistance to organizational change: linking research and practice. Resistance to Organizational Change, 31(1), 39-56.

Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1999). Unfairness and resistance to change: Hardship as mistreatment. Journal of Organizational Change, 12(1), 35-50.

Ford, J.; Ford, L., & D'Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to change: the rest of the story, Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362-377.

Furst, S., & Cable, D. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 453-462.

Gerstner, C., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlate and construct issues . Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. CA: Sociology Press Mill Valley.

Glover, L. (2006). Postmodern climate change, New York: Rutledge.

Hadavinejad, M., & Darzi, L. (2016). Workplace deviant behaviors: Explaining the role of organizational support perception, injustice perception, personality, and frustration. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 6(24), 151-173. (in Persian).

Hadavinejad, M., & Ebadi, F. (2015). Top management’s hypocrisy and employee’s resistance to change: explaining the mediating role of trust to top management. Transformation Management Journal, 6(12), 49-71. (in Persian).

Hadavinejad, M., & Tamaddon, S. (2014). Exploring personality traits effecting on behavioral resistance to change: a phenomenology. Strategic Management Thought, 8(1), 157-189. (in Persian).

Isern, J., & Pung, C. (2007). Harnessing energy to drive organizational change. McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 1-4.

Kaplan, H. B. (1975). Self-attituds and behavior deviant. Pacific palicade, CA: Goodyear.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. an introduction to qualitative research writing. CA: Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, (2007). ‘‘Ain’t Misbehavin’’: workplace deviance as organizational resistance. Journal of Management, 33(3), 378-394.

Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142.

Martin, A. J.; Jones, E. S., & Callan, V. J. (1999). The role of psychological climate in facilitating employee adjustment during organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 263-289.

Muo, I. (2014). The other side of change resistance. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3(1), 96-112.

Novelli, L.; Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (1995). Effective implementation of organizational change: an organizational justice perspective. in C. L. Cooper, & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: 2 (pp. 15-36). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

O'Connor, C. (1993). Resistance: the repercussions of change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 14(6), 30-36.

Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1),73-101.

Osborne, J. W. (1994). Some similarities and differences among phenomenological and other methods of psychological qualitative research. Canadian Psychology, 35(2), 167-189.

Padro de Val, M., & Fuentes, C. M. (2003). Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Management Decision, 41(2), 148-155.

Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: a multidimensional view of attitudes toward organizational change. Academy of Management, 25(4), 783-794.

Qamar, B., & Ali, Q. (2012). Towards a hybrid model of strategic change: combining revolutionary and evolutionary aproaches together. International Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(5), 1-10.

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.

Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspective of social psychology. Ney York: McGrow Hill.

Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 27-37.

Schweiger, D. M., & DeNisi, A. S. (1991). Communication with employees Following a merger: a lokgotudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 110-135.

Szabla, D. B. (2007). A multidimensional view of resistance to organizational change: exploring cognitive, emotional, and intentional responses to planned change across perceived change leadership strategies. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(4), 525-558.

Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(4), 281-292.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: Sunny Press.

Van Emmerik, I. J. H.; Bakker. A. B., & Euwema, M. C. (2009). Explaining employees’ evaluations of organizational change with the job-demands resources model. Career Development International, 14(6), 594-613.

Waddell, D. & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Resistance: a constructive tool for change management. Management Decision, 36(8), 543-548.

Wojnar, D. M., & Swanson, K. M. (2007). Phenomenology an exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 25(3), 172-180.

Yue, W. (2008). Resistance, the echo of change. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(2), 84-89.

Zander, A. F. (1950). Resistance to change: Its analysis and prevention. Advanced Management, 4(5), 9-11.