Investigating the Impact of Fun at Work on Job Satisfaction and Work Engagement of Employees through the Mediating Role of Innovative Behavior

Document Type : مقالات

Authors

• Narges Rahnama
• Alireza Khorakian
• Shmsodin Nazemi

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

https://doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v9i18.61943

Abstract

1- INTRODUCTION
The human resources of any organization are their most valuable assets, because in the competitive environment of today's organization,‌ one of the most important factors that maintains the competitive advantage of‌ organizations and their dominance over environmental challenges is‌ the human resources and organizations should try to improve their quality. Job satisfaction and work engagement are both the factors that affect the improvement of employees’ performance. What is important is the role of an important factor called fun at work, which is ignored by organizations. Based on the findings of recent studies, fun at work and innovative behavior are factors influencing job satisfaction and work engagement. It seems that few studies have been done investigating the role of fun at work its positive consequences such as innovative behavior on job satisfaction. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate this phenomenon. Fun at work is especially more important for organizations operating in the service sector such as municipalities which are mainly dependent on human resource and carry out extensive tasks to serve the citizens, and provide conditions which improve employees’ performance. There‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ is no exception about Municipality of Mashhad. Mashhad municipality managers believe that job dissatisfaction and reduced work engagement of employees have decreased productivity and quality of service delivery to citizens. In this regard, this research has been carried out in the municipality of Mashhad. In addition, we tried to study the impact of fun at work on job satisfaction and work engagement of employees and examine the role of innovative behavior of employees as a mediator.

2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
During the last decade, managerial studies have focused on fun at work. A variety of studies show the importance of fun at work as one of the dimensions of the workplace and also as a factor which makes different outcoms of work place. Fluegge (2008, 2014) defines fun at work as a work activity; an interpersonal and social work at the workplace, which has a joyful nature and enhances the entertainment and pleasure of individuals. This definition is consistent with previous definitons provided by MacDowell (2004), Becker (2012), Lim and Meeks (2009), and McLaughlin and Newstar (2003). In various studies, the factors influencing innovative behavior have been investigated at three levels of analysis: individual level, work group, and organization. Anderson, De Dreu & Nijstad (2004) presented a summary of their findings on the factors influencing innovation including self-esteem, and initiative, motivational and cognitive abilities at the individual level, job characteristics at work level, factors such as team atmosphere and the characteristics of the team members at team level, and ultimately factors such as culture, strategy and structure affecting innovation at the organizational level. Job satisfaction is one of the important factors in increasing productivity, employee commitment, attachment to the workplace, improving the quality and quantity of work, establishing good and human relationships in the workplace, and increasing interest in the work. It refers to positive or pleasing feelings of persons coming from evaluateing their job or their job experience. The widespread study of the literature on job satisfaction and related concepts from Weiss (2002) suggest that not only does job satisfaction include a positive attitude toward the job, but also a person's positive feelings towards that job. Work engagement is basically a motivating entity that shows the individuals' willingness to devote themselves entirely to work. Work engagement refers to the identification purpose and focusing on organizational goals. Jahangir, Khorakian and Lagzzian (2016) studied the effect of work attachment on innovative behavior with the mediating role of error sharing. The results of their research showed that work engagement has a positive and significant effect on the sharing of errors and the production of the ideas.

3- METHODOLOGY
The present study has an applied and survey-analytical purpose. The survey population of this study is the employees of Municipality of Mashhad which includes experts, district officials and heads of departments with a total number of 340. The sample size included 181 individuals which was determined using Morgan table. They were selected using simple random sampling method. The questionnaire was a lickert scale and consisted of 31 items and four dimesnions of fun at work, innovative behavior, work engagement and job satisfaction. In this research, fun at work was measured using the four subscales of McDowell (2004). Fun at work scale includes socializing with coworkers, celebrating at work, personal freedoms and global fun at work. Eighteen items derived from McDowell's (2004) study have been used to measure this variable. Work engagement measurements were measured using six items of Rich, Lepine & Crawford (2010) study. In order to measure the innovative behavior, four items derived from Fluegge’s (2008) study have been used. After collecting data, structural validity was calculated using confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS software. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis for the items in the questionnaire were less than 0.05, and therefore the significance of the items was confirmed.

4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The findings of this study are consistent with the literature on workplace fun confirming the positive outcomes of fun at work. Fun at work has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction and employees’ work engagement. On the other hand, the positive influence of fun at work on innovative behavior was also confirmed. The results of this study are consistent with the results of other studies. In Fluegge's (2008, 2014) research, there is also a positive and significant correlation between fun at work and innovative behavior. It can be argued that fun at work is a source for creative and innovative divergent thinking. Fun at work has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction. Job stress will decrease and positive feelings about work will increase if the working process is enjoyable for people. The positive and significant relationship between fun at work and work engagement is consistent with the results of previous studies. For example, Ching (2010) concluded that employees who experience fun at work are more satisfied about their job. Previous studies including Fluegge (2008, 2014) and MacDowell (2004) show that there is a strong relationship between fun at work and work engagement; thus, it can be said that fun at work plays an important role in increasing employees’ engagement.

5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
The results of this study, like other previous studies, indicate the great impact of fun at work on job performance. Fun at work has both a direct and indirect impact on job satisfaction and work engagement. In addition, the positive and significant positive effects of innovative behavior on job satisfaction and work engagement of municipality employees in Mashhad were also confirmed. Fun at work is influential in enhancing the innovative behavior of the municipality's employees in Mashhad. On the other hand, people who experience fun at work are also more likely to be more engaged with their work and therefore are more creative. In this research, work engagement is considered as the cognitive outcome of fun at work. Fun at work acts as a positive job resource, whereby employees find the ability to regain energy and focus on their work. Since fun at work is part of the work activity and it is emphasized that it is not considered as opposite to work, both of them are not counter productive of a spectrum. It can also be suggested that work-oriented meetings be hold with the aim of solving the problem or provideing ideas for improving performance outside the office space and in a fun and friendly atmosphere with the presence of managers. Based on the demand-source model which refers to job resources such as physical, social, psychological or organizational dimensions of the occupation, fun at work reduces job demands, and increases individual learning, goal achieving, and also work engagement of employees.

Fun at work, Innovative behavior, Work engagement, Job satisfaction

Keywords

• Fun at work
• Innovative behavior
• Work engagement
• Job satisfaction

References

Abramis, D. J. (1990). Play in work. Journal of American Behavioral scientist, 33(3), 353-373.

Amabile, T. M.; Conti, R.; Coon, H.; Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.

Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45-68.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.

Baron, R. A., & Tang, J. (2009). The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2011), 49-60.

Becker, F. (2012). The impact of fun in the workplace on experienced fun, work engagement, constituent attachment, and turnover among entry-level service employees. Unpublished PhD, the Pennsylvania State University.

Berg, D. H. (2001). The power of a playful spirit at work. The Journal for Quality Participation, 24(2), 57-62.

Bolton, sh., & Houlihan, M. (2009). Are we having fun yet? A consideration of workplace fun and engagement, Employee Relation, 31(6), 556-568

Clouse, R. W., & Spurgeon, K. L. (1995). Corporate analysis of humor, Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 32(3), 1-24.

Ching, Y. H., & Ying In, C. (2010). Workplace Fun and Job Satisfaction: the Moderating Effects of Attitudes toward Fun (Doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong Baptist University Hong Kong).

Cummings, L. L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior: an Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1-74.

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour, Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.

Dea, T., & Kennedy, A. (1999). The new corporate culture. Available from http://www.amazon.com/The-New-Corporate-Cultures-Reengineering/dp/0738203807

Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A. B.; Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512.

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010), Measuring innovative work behaviour, Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.

Eisakhani, A., & Barazande, L. (2016). The impact of social support on employee welfare through mediating role of workaholism and work engagement. Journal of Human resource management studies. 25, 83-108, (in persian).

Esen, E. (2002). SHRM Fun Work Environment Survey. Society for Human Resource Management, Alexandria, VA.

Fluegge, W. (2008). Fun at work and its effects on job performance: who put the fun in functional? Unpublished Ph.D. university of Florida, United States.

Fluegge, W. (2014). Play hard, work hard,,Management Research Review, 37, 682-705.

Ford, R. C.; McLaughlin, F. S., & Newstrom, J. W. (2003). Questions and answers about fun at work. Human Resource Planning, 26, 18-33.

Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1992). The adult playfulness scale: an initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71, 83-103.

Han, H.; Kim, W., & Jeong, C. (2016). Workplace fun for better team performance: focus on frontline hotel employees, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(7), 1391–1416.

Jahangir, M.; Khorakian, A., & Lagzian, M. (2016). The effect of work engagement on innovative behavior. Innovation management Journal, 1, 20-52.

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of occupational Psychology, 73, 287-302.

Janssen, O.; Vliert, E. V. D., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 129-145.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.

Kanter, R. (1996). When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Knowledge Management and Organizational Design, 93-131

Karl, K. A.; Peluchette, J. V., & Harland, L. (2007). Is fun for everyone? Personality differences in healthcare providers attitudes toward fun. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 29, 409-447.

Karl, K. A., & Harland, L. (2005). What’s fun and what’s not: an examination of age, gender differences, and attitudes toward fun activities at work. Proceedings of the Midwest Academy of Management meeting, Chicago, IL.

Karl, K. A., & Peluchette, J. (2006). Does workplace fun buffer the impact of emotional exhaustion on job dissatisfaction? a study of health care workers. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7(2), 128-141.

Karl, K. A.; Peluchette, J.; Hall, L., & Harland, L. (2005). Attitudes toward workplace fun: a three sector comparison. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(1), 1-17.

Khanifar, H.; jandaqi, GH.; Ahmadi, H., & Hosseni. M. (2011). Work engagement and its relation with organizational justice. (in persian)

Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Towards a Multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.

Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation, Hutchinson, London.

Kwai Fatt, Ch.; Wong Sek Khin, E., & Ngee Heng, T. (2010). The Impact of Organizational Justice on Employee’s Job Satisfaction: The Malaysian Companies Perspectives, American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2(1), 56-63.

Lamm, E., & Meeks, M. P. (2009). Workplace fun: the moderating effects of generational differences. Employee Relations, 31(6), 613-631.

Masten, A. S., & Obradovic, J. (2006). Competence and resilience in development. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 13-27.

McClenahen, J. S. (1996). On the job: lean and mean. Industry week, 241. 30-34.

McDowell, T. (2004). Fun at work: Scale development, confirmatory factor analysis,and links to organizational outcomes unpublished Ph. D, Alliant International University, united states, San Diego.

McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2010). Organizational Behavior: Individual Behavior and Processes. (Translation Khorakian, A. Jahangir, M. Rahnama, S. N. (2016). Mashhad: Aban Bartar publication. (in persian).

Miller, A. M. (2005). Fun in the workplace: toward an environment-behavior framework relating office design, employee creativity, and job satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).

Moghimi, M. (2012). Organization and management research approach. Tehran: Termeh Publication, (8th Ed). (in persian)

Odom, R. Y.; Boxx, W. R., & Gunn, M. G. (1990). Organizational cultures, commitment, satisfaction, and cohesion. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14(2), 157-169.

Parsa Nejad, M. (2012). Relation of organizational creativity and job stress in agriculture organization employees. Journal of Modern Industrial/Organizational Psychology .8, 71-84. (in persian)

Parsaian, A. (1999). Organizational behavior, (1st Ed). Tehran: cultural research office. (in persian)

Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. A. (2005). Attitudes toward incorporating fun into the health care workplace. The Health Care Manager, 24(3), 268-275.

Plester, B., & Hutchison. A. (2016). Relationship between fun and workplace engagement. Employee Relations. 38(3), 332-350.

Rank, J.; Pace, V.; & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology an International Review, 53(4), 518-528

Rich, B. L.; Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.

Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The use of humor in the workplace, Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2). 58-69.

Sameer, Y. (2016). Innovative behavior of employees: a model of antecedents and consequences, a deeper look at psychological and organizational factors, entrepreneurship, Responsible management, and economic development, 14-17.

Sawyer, R. K.; John-Steiner, V.; Moran, S.; Sternberg, R. J.; Feldman, D. H.; Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Creativity and development. Oxford University Press

Schaufeli, W. B.; Bakker, A. B., & Rhenen, W. V. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 893-917.

Sharon C., & Bolton, M. H. (2009). Are we having fun yet? a consideration of workplace fun and engagement, Employee Relations, 31(6), 556 - 568

Seligman, M. E. P. (2002a). Authentic happiness. Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York, NY: Free Press.

Schaufeli, W. B.; Salanova, M.; Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.

Scott, W. E., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinant of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.

Shalley, C. E.; Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 215-223.

Society for Human Resource Management, (2002). SHRM Fun work Environment survey. From http://shrm.org

Vimala, B., & Bee, A. J. A. (2014). Study on relationship between workplace fun culture and job satisfaction among IT professionals. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 2(10), 2321-3418.

Von Oech, R. (1982). A Whack on the side of the head, Creative Think, Menlo Park, CA.

Weiss, H. M.; Cropanzano, R. S.; Barry M., & Cummings, L. L. (1996). Research in organizational behavior: an annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, 18, 1-74.

West, M. A., & Altink, W. M. M. (1996). Innovation at work: individual, group, organizational, and socio-historical perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 3-11.