Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD in Human Resource Management, University of Tehran

2 Assistant Professor of Management, University of Tehran

3 PHD in Management, Islamic Azad University

Abstract

1- INTRODUCTION
One of the most important concerns of developing countries is the change in the form of products and services. due to the increasing facilities, communication, and innovation in the environment around organizations, these communities have been persuaded to act more intelligently in human resource process engineering (including selection and employment, appointment, career planning, etc.) than in the past. considering the great importance and at the same time keeping silent about the phenomenon of job demotion in organizations, this study seeks to provide different models in this field and summarize them in order to identify the dimensions, predictors, and outcomes of job demotion. in this way, organizations will be able to plan in more detail to achieve their excellent goals, which also leads to employee excellence.
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Job demotion includes various concepts, the most important and clear definition of which is going back or moving downward. in an organizational context, it means an employee's movement to a less important position. job demotion has different dimensions such as salary reduction. Job demotion factors are at macro, intermediate, and micro levels. macroeconomic recession leads to reorganization or devaluation of the organization. Employers are forced to move back to work to maintain the experience and knowledge of employees in order to recover from the economic downturn. Mergers, reorganizations, and redundancies are among the measures that can be taken at the intermediate level to implement job rotation.
3- METHODOLOGY
The present study has a qualitative approach accomplished using a hybrid strategy. hypertext is one type of meta-study. Meta-synthesis approach is a qualitative strategy to examine the information and findings extracted from other qualitative studies related to the same subject. Therefore, the sample for meta-synthesis consists of selected qualitative studies based on their relevance to the research question.
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
In this study, the job demotion phenomenon and its determinants were investigated to make them more clear in the organization context. after reviewing 32 related studies, in regard to job demotion factors, four categories, 18 concepts, and 53 codes were identified. the identified categories are titled individual, organizational, intermediate, and environmental. in regard to its dimensions, five categories, 10 concepts, and 53 codes were extracted. the identified categories are titled organizational hierarchy reduction, organizational authority reduction, job content weakness, work path dismissal, and compensation weakness.
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
Management of any phenomenon requires correct knowledge and understanding of that phenomenon. thus, after reviewing the literature, we concluded that job demotion is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon. no systematic effort has been done regarding this forgotten process in organizations, and accordingly, it has not been well recognized for many years. therefore, it is necessary to consider the outcomes of job demotion. Job demotion, if it is desired by employees, has few positive outcomes for the organization and its employees. instead, if job loss is desired by the organization and employees do not interfere, it will have many negative consequences for both the organization and employees. thus, it is important to act intelligently in the field of career path, appointment, and promotion. Career promotion may create satisfaction and motivation in a limited period of time, and if the adopted policy for an employee is not appropriate and timely, it will go back after a while. in the long term, it may cause job depression, improper performance, absence and delay, dissatisfaction and lack of motivation, etc.
In order to facilitate the mental condition of the employees, the organizations should provide the possibility of organizational or extra-organizational movement in order to release the person from the previous stressful atmosphere. employees and their attitudes towards the organization's processes, missions, and goals should be strengthened because it is suspected that being oppressed by the organization may lead to treacherous behaviors by victims. reducing burnout for employees due to relieving themselves of the burden of responsibility and the large volume of tasks assigned, maybe a positive burden for employees who voluntarily choose job demotion. this is a sign for organizations to constantly monitor employees. employees should not be left with heavy responsibilities because after a while they will suffer from this organizational complication. in some cases, employees lose the motivation and mobility to play the assigned role and become the source of the virus of despair and hopelessness in the organization. Accordingly, it is recommended the options of parallel relocation or even degradation. one type of determinant of this phenomenon is disciplinary factors. It is recommended that the choice of job demotion be the last resort in decision making. structural or formal processes like horizontalizing the structure or downsizing are other factors for the occurrence of job demotion. therefore, it is suggested that virtual structures be designed and used effectively and continuously in the organization. Another factor is the weak social capital that forces the employees to build trusted, positive, and useful communication to prevent job demotion. due to the economic conditions prevailing in organizations, the organizations should try to keep employees away from economic shocks. They should seek to create horizontal structures by doing so job losses will be reduced.

Keywords

References
Arthur, M.; Kharpova, S., & Wilderom, C. (2005). Career success in a boundary less career world, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2),177-202.
Bird, A. (1996). Careers as repositories of knowledge: considerations for boundaryless careers, 17(2), 193-228.
Bench, S., & Day, T. (2010). The user experience of critical care discharges: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, (447) (487-499).
Bo zi on el os N. (2015). Social capital and careers: indisputable evidence and note for caution. handbook of research on sustainable careers (67.82). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: routledg, Open Journal of Political Science, 5(1).
Colquitt, J. (2012). Organizational justice, in Kozlowski, S. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 52(1).526-547.
Carson, P. P., & Carson, K. D. (2007). Demystifying demotion: a look at the psychological and economic consequences on the demotee, Business Horizons, 50(9),455-466.
Chruden, Herbert J.; Arthur, W., & Sherman, Jr. (1976). Personnel Management. Cincinnati: south-western publishing company.
Dohmen.T.; Kriechel, B., & Pfann, G. (2004). Monkey bars and ladders: the importance of lateral and vertical job mobility in internal labor market careers, Journal of Populatio Economics 73(3), 383-406
De Graaf, R. (2017). Employee perspectives and attitudes towards demotion, master thesis, maastricht university. 
Emans, B. (2011). Commotie over demotie, werkgeven 1: 18/19.
Eby, L. T., & DeMatteo, J. S. (2000). When the type of move matters: Employee outcomes under various relocation situations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 677–687.
Feldman, D., & Ng, T. (2007). Careers, mobility, embeddedness, and success, Journal of Management. 33(3), 350-377
Farndale, E.; Hope-Hailey, V., & Kelliher, C. (2011). High commitment performance management: the roles of justice and trust. Personnel Review. 40(1), 5-23.
Ferris, G. R.; Treadway, D. C.; Kolodinsky, R. W.; Hochwarter, W. A.; Kacmar, C. J., & Douglas, C. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(6), 126-152
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
Goldner, F. H. (1965). Demotion in industrial management, american sociological review, 01 Oct 1965, 30(5),714-724.
Gielen, A. C., & Van Ours, J. C. (2006). Age-specific cyclical effects in job reallocation and labor mobility, Labour Economics, 13(2). 493-504.
Golembiewski, R. (1982). The demotion design: an option for forward looking firms, National Productivity Review. 2(1), 63-70.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. (2000). Behavior in organizations. understanding and managing the human side of work, 7th ed., prentice hall inc., london
Hendrik, P.; van Dalena., & Kène Henkens. (2016). Why demotion of older workers is a no-go area for managers, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 150-168.
Heneman Herbert. G, Jr. (1971). Downward management development. Personnel Journal 50 (September): 720-721.
Hall, D., & Isabella, L. (1985). Downward movement and career development, Organizational Dynamics, 5-23.
Hennekam. S.; McKenna, S.; Richardson, J., & Ananthram, S. (2019). Perceptions of demotion decisions: a social capital perspective, European Management. 730-741
Harvey, J. H. (2001). The psychology of loss as a lens to positive psychology. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(5), 838−853.
Hedaa, L. (1978). Demotion: a step in the right direction”, Personnel Management. 10(5).10, 45
Hofstede, G.; Neuijen, B.; Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: a qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. administrative science quarterly, 35(2), 286-316.
Josten, T., & Schalk, R. (2010). The effects of demotion on older and younger employees, Personnel Review. 39(2). 195-209.
Judge, T., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology. 63(2). 341-367.
Krause, R., & Semadeni, M. (2013). Apprentice, departure, and demotion: an examination of the three types of ceo-board separation. academy of management.
Kohl, J., & Stephens, D. (1990). Is demotion a four-letter word? Business Horizons. 33(2) 74-76.
Kooij, D. T.; Guest, D. E.; Clinton, M.; Knight, T.; Jansen, P. G., & Dikkers, J. S. (2013). How the impact of HR practices on employee well-being and performance changes with age. Human Resource Management Journal, 23, 18e35.
Lyons, S.; Schweitzer, L., & Ng, E., & Kuron, L. (2012). Comparing apples to apples: a qualitative investigation of career mobility patterns across four generations, Career Development International. 17. 4. 333-357.
Littler, C. R.; Wiesner, R., & Dunford, R. (2003). The dynamics of delayering: changing management structures in three countries. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 225–256.
Lyons, S.; Schweitzer, L.; Ng, E., & Kuron, L. (2012). Comparing apples to apples: a qualitative investigation of career mobility patterns across four generations, career development international. 17(4). 333-357.
Lima, F. (2001). Careers and wage growth within large firms.IZA, Business & Economics. 17(4). 330-372.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. (2008). The truth about burnout: how organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it”, jossey-bass, san fransisco.
Maniha.J. (2009). Organizational Demotion and the Process of Bureaucratization, Social Problems. 20. 2 (Autumn, 1972). 161-173
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. (2009). Demotion, merriam-webster online dictionary.available at: www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/demotion (accessed 20 January).
More, D. (1962). Demotion, social problems, 9(3). 213-221.
Mulders, J.; Henkens, K., & schippers, J. (2013). Organizations’ways of employing early retirees: the role of age-based HR policies. the gerontologist. Doi:10.1093/geront/gnt114
Ng, T. W. H.; Sorensen, K. L.; Eby, L. T., & Feldman, D. C. (2007). Determinants of job mobility: a theoretical integration and extension. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(3), 363-386.
Oude Mulders; J.; Henkens, K., & Schippers, J. (2015). Organizations’ ways of employing early retirees: the role of age-based HR policies, the gerontologis. 55. 3. 374-383.
 
Pettit, N.; Yong, K., & Sparato, S. (2010). Holding your place: reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 46. 2. 396-401.
Purcell, J.; Kinnie, N.; Hutchinson, S.; Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2003). Understanding the people and performance link: unlocking the black box, CIPD publishing, london
Roel van, E., & Marinus, V. (2018). HR Analytics: a case study on the internal employee mobility in a large multinational, tilburg university.
Richardson, J., & Kelliher, C. (2015). Managing visibility for career sustainability: a study of remote workers. in A. De Vos, & B. Van der Heijden (Eds.), handbook of research on sustainable careers (116e130).
Roel, van E., & Marinus, V. (2018). HR Analytics: a case study on the internal employee mobility in a large multinational, tilburg university.
Sargent, L. (2003). Effects of a downward status transition on perception of career success, role performance and job identification, Australian Journal of Psychology. 55 No. 2. 114-20.
Sprague, R. (1984). The high cost of personal transitions, Training and Development Journal, 38(10), pp. 61-64
Verheyen,T.; Deschacht, N., & Anne Guerry, M. (2014). The occurrence of demotions regarding job level, salary and job authority, free university of brussels (VUB).
Verheyen. T., & Guerry, M. A. (2014). Structuring dimensions of demotion: a typology of demotion based on cluster analysis, working paper.
Veiga, J. (1981). Do managers on the move get anywhere? harvard business review, pp. 20-21.
Verheyen, T., & Vermeir, B. (2011). Demotie, een stap terug is een stap vooruit, Kluwer, Mechelen. [remotion, a downward step is an upward step].
Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2016). Why demotion of older workers is a no-go area for managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 40(2), 2018. pp. 244-263
Verhein, T., & Guerry, M. A. (2017). Motives for (non) practicing demotion, Employee Relations. 40( 2). 244-263.
William, H.;  Holley, Kenneth M.; Jennings., & Roger S. Wolters. (1990). The Labor Relations, publisher: cengage learning.
Yussof, W.; Kian, T., & Idris, M. (2013). Herzberg’ two factor theory on work motivation: does its work for today’s environment? Global Journal of Commerce and Management Perspective, 2.
CAPTCHA Image