Investigating the Relationship between Cognitive Decision-Making Style and Innovative Work Behavior

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Amin Hashemi ¹
• A Jassbi ²
• A Bonyadi Naeini ³
• M. R. Daliri ⁴

¹ 1- Ph. D Student of Science and Technology Policy, Department of Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

² Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

³ Associate Professor, Department of Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

⁴ Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/tmj.2023.74795.1245

Abstract

 
1- INTRODUCTION
The study of business transformation trends in current organizations, especially in knowledge-based ones, indicates new trends in the business environment in which innovation is considered the main factor of advancement, power, and competitiveness. Meanwhile, the human capital of organizations, which is one of their intangible values, plays a key role in realizing and promoting innovation. With regards to employees of organizations as the initiators of the innovation process, the implementation of innovative policies in organizations seems to depend largely on their employees’ characteristics. Meanwhile, cognitive styles are proven to be the cause of differentiation in individuals. Since innovation is the result of having problem-solving insights in individuals, taking individual perspectives among the various factors affecting organizational innovation, this study is aimed to recognize and investigate the relationship between the employees’ decision-making style and their innovative work behavior.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Innovative work behavior is the intentional behavior of employees to create, introduce, and implement new ideas to reach shared organizational benefits. This behavior is a multidimensional construct at the individual level consisting of exploring, producing, supporting, and implementing an idea by employees. Among potential affecting factors, cognitive decision-making styles are of most important ones that affect employees’ innovative behaviors. Few studies in this field examined individual factors like employees' characteristics as a basis for innovative work behavior. Cognitive styles are made up of employees' physical and psychological characteristics that determine their individual and organizational behaviors. Studies indicate that styles for performing complex tasks such as problem-solving, decision-making, learning, and causal explanations of life events are compatible with changing work routines. Kirton's adaptive-innovative style is comprised of three dimensions of originality, efficiency, and rule governance, based on which employees analyze and solve the problems considering the two ends of adaptation and innovation. Originality shows employees' creativity in problem-solving; efficiency refers to accuracy, reliability, and discipline; rule governance deals with respect for regulations and legal authorities.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
Employing a quantitative research method and a researcher-made conceptual model, the relationships between innovative work behavior and its components (exploration, generation, advocation, and implementation of ideas) with cognitive decision-making style and its components (originality, efficiency, and rule governance) were examined. Also, the moderating effects of age, gender, and organizational position were analyzed. The needed data was gathered by distributing questionnaires among 950 employees working in 12 different departments of a knowledge-based IT firm. Linear regression analysis was conducted in SPSS v.27 and Minitab v.20 software to test the research hypotheses.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
All the components of the decision-making style did not affect the innovative work behavior. In fact, decision-making style was only a good predictor for two components of innovative work behavior, including exploration and generation of ideas. Research results also indicated that the variables of age, gender, and organizational position moderate the relationship between decision-making style and innovative work behavior. In addition, pieces of evidence were found for the association of originality with idea generation and efficiency with idea implementation. It was also determined that, among various components of decision-making style, rule governance has a strong relationship with the advocation and implementation of ideas.
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
The relationship between decision-making style and innovative work behavior has been rarely studied. This study would thereby enrich the literature by extending the current knowledge because suggested that having decision-making insights play a significant role in the emergence of innovative behavior. Given the strong relationship between rule governance and advocating and implementing ideas, it is concluded that both the organizational and individual factors have an important role in accomplishing innovativeness in organizations. Therefore, future researchers are recommended to consider individual and organizational factors simultaneously to better percept organizational innovation.

Keywords

• Innovative Work Behavior
• Cognitive Style
• Decision-making Style
• Innovation

References

Aldahdouh, T. Z.; Korhonen, V., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). What contributes to individual innovativeness? A multilevel perspective. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(2), 23-39.

AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. M. (2021). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly, 1-38.

Alfy, S. E., & Naithani, P. (2021). Antecedents of innovative work behaviour: a systematic review of the literature and future research agenda. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(1), 1-19.

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation.

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations (Vol. 5): Harvard Business School Boston, MA.

Amo, B. W. (2006). What motivates knowledge workers to involve themselves in employee innovation behaviour? International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 1(1-2), 160-177.

Anderson, N.; Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.

Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 33(5471), 1-8.

Armstrong, S. J.; Cools, E., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2012). Role of cognitive styles in business and management: Reviewing 40 years of research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 238-262.

Armstrong, S. J., & Mahmud, A. (2008). Experiential learning and the acquisition of managerial tacit knowledge. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 189-208.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Foxall, G. R. (1995). Construct validity and generalizability of the Kirton Adaption–Innovation Inventory. European journal of personality, 9(3), 185-206.

Basadur, M. (2004). Leading others to think innovatively together: Creative leadership. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 103-121.

Batra, S., & Vohra, N. (2016). Exploring the linkages of cognitive style and individual innovativeness. Management Research Review.

Bawuro, F. A.; Shamsuddin, A.; Wahab, E., & Usman, H. (2019). Mediating role of meaningful work in the relationship between intrinsic motivation and innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9), 2076-2084.

Blanka, C. (2018). An individual-level perspective on intrapreneurship: a review and ways forward. Review of Managerial Science, 13(5), 919-961. doi:10.1007/s11846-018-0277-0

Bouchard, V., & Basso, O. (2011). Exploring the links between entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development.

Camelo-Ordaz, C.; Fernández-Alles, M.; Ruiz-Navarro, J., & Sousa-Ginel, E. (2012). The intrapreneur and innovation in creative firms. International Small Business Journal, 30(5), 513-535.

Chang, Y.-Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2013). Innovative cognitive style, proactive personality and employee creativity: The moderating effects of work discretion and time pressure. Paper presented at the 2013 Proceedings of PICMET'13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET).

Chen, M.-H.; Chang, Y.-Y., & Chang, Y.-C. (2015). Exploring individual-work context fit in affecting employee creativity in technology-based companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 1-12.

Choi, S. B.; Kim, K.; Ullah, S. E., & Kang, S.-W. (2016). How transformational leadership facilitates innovative behavior of Korean workers: Examining mediating and moderating processes. Personnel Review.

Cools, E.; Armstrong, S. J., & Verbrigghe, J. (2014). Methodological practices in cognitive style research: Insights and recommendations from the field of business and psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 627-641.

Cunningham, R. (1999). The Kirton Adaptation--Innovation Inventory.

Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2019). A Self‐Report Measure of Productive Thinking in Solving Insight Problems. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 97-108.

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.

De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management.

De Jong, J. P., & Kemp, R. (2003). Determinants of co-workers' innovative behaviour: An investigation into knowledge intensive services. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(02), 189-212.

Dorenbosch, L.; Engen, M. L. V., & Verhagen, M. (2005). On‐the‐job innovation: The impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 129-141.

Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 654-681.

Goepel, M.; Hölzle, K., & zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, D. (2012). Individuals’ innovation response behaviour: A framework of antecedents and opportunities for future research. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(4), 412-426.

Goldsmith, R. E., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). The measurement of innovativeness. The international handbook on innovation, 5, 321-330.

Griffin, M. A.; Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.

Guerrero, M., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2013). The effect of intrapreneurial experience on corporate venturing: Evidence from developed economies. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 397-416.

Hapsari, C.; Stoffers, J., & Gunawan, A. (2019). The influence of generational diversity management and leader–member exchange on innovative work behaviors mediated by employee engagement. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 20(2), 125-139.

Harrison, D. A.; Price, K. H.; Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029-1045.

Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1994). Cognitive style and its relevance for management practice. British journal of management, 5(1), 53-71.

Hee Kim, K. (2006). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251-259.

Howell, J. M.; Shea, C. M., & Higgins, C. A. (2005). Champions of product innovations: defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior. Journal of business venturing, 20(5), 641-661.

Hu, M.-L. M.; Horng, J.-S., & Sun, Y.-H. C. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism management, 30(1), 41-50.

Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3), 42-54.

Hurt, H. T.; Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.

Ibrahim, H. I.; Mohamad, W. M. W., & Shah, K. A. M. (2018). Organizational innovative climate as a predictor of innovative behaviour among engineers in the electrical and electronic manufacturing industry. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, 1-14.

Isaksen, S. G., & Puccio, G. J. (1988). Adaption-innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The level-style issue revisited. Psychological Reports, 63(2), 659-670.

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302.

Janssen, O.; Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of organizational behavior, 25(2), 129-145.

Johnson, R. H. (1978). Individual Styles of Decision Making: A Theoretical Model for Counseling. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 56(9), 530-536.

Kessel, M.; Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 147-157.

Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of applied psychology, 61(5), 622.

Kirton, M. J. (1977). Adaptors and innovators and superior-subordinate identification. Psychological Reports, 41(1), 289-290.

Kirton, M. J. (1977). Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory [Research edition]. London: National Federation for Educational Research

Kirton, M. J. (1989). Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem-solving: Routledge.

Kirton, M. J. (2004). Adaption-innovation: In the context of diversity and change: Routledge.

Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of intellectual Capital.

Knight, D., & Randall, R. M. (2005). Editors' letter. Strategy & Leadership, 33(1). doi:10.1108/sl.2005.26133aaa.001

Kong, Y., & Li, M. (2018). Proactive personality and innovative behavior: The mediating roles of job-related affect and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3), 431-446.

Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological bulletin, 133(3), 464.

Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 79-102.

Kundu, A., & Roy, D. D. (2016). INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOUR OF SCHOOL TEACHERS: ROLE OF BELIEF FOR INNOVATION AND PERSONALITY PATTERNS. Journal of Organisation & Human Behaviour, 5(1).

Larson, M. (2011). Innovation and creativity in festival organizations. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 20(3-4), 287-310.

Li, D.; Zheng, M.; Cao, C.; Chen, X.; Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017). The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 41-49.

Li, M., & Hsu, C. H. (2016). A review of employee innovative behavior in services. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

Liu, Z.; Ge, L., & Peng, W. (2016). How organizational tenure affects innovative behavior? The role of culture difference and status determinants. Nankai Business Review International.

Lomberg, C.; Kollmann, T., & Stöckmann, C. (2017). Different styles for different needs–The effect of cognitive styles on idea generation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(1), 49-59.

Lowe, E., & Taylor, W. (1986). Creativity in life sciences research. R&D Management, 16(1), 45-61.

Madrid, H. P.; Patterson, M. G.; Birdi, K. S.; Leiva, P. I., & Kausel, E. E. (2014). The role of weekly high‐activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: a multilevel and interactional model. Journal of organizational behavior, 35(2), 234-256.

Mariz-Pérez, R. M.; Teijeiro-Álvarez, M. M., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2012). The relevance of human capital as a driver for innovation. Cuadernos de economía, 35(98), 68-76.

Martiarena, A. (2013). What’s so entrepreneurial about intrapreneurs? Small Business Economics, 40(1), 27-39.

Masalimova, A. R.; Mikhaylovsky, M. N.; Grinenko, A. V.; Smirnova, M. E.; Andryushchenko, L. B.; Kochkina, M. A., & Kochetkov, I. G. (2019). The interrelation between cognitive styles and copying strategies among student youth. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(4), em1695.

Messick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. Individuality in learning, 4, 22.

Miao, Q.; Newman, A.; Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71-81.

Miron-Spektor, E.; Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 740-760.

Miron, E.; Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of organizational behavior, 25(2), 175-199.

Moriano, J. A.; Molero, F.; Topa, G., & Mangin, J.-P. L. (2014). The influence of transformational leadership and organizational identification on intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1), 103-119.

Nangoy, R.; Hamsal, M.; Setiadi, N. J., & Pradipto, Y. D. (2019). The roles of employee work well-being on innovative work behaviour mediated by organisational commitment. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 18(3), 314-327.

Nosal, C. S. (1990). Psychologiczne modele umyslu [Psychological models of mind]. Warsaw, Poland: PWN.

Nguyen, T.; Tran, N.; Doan, X., & Nguyen, H. (2020). The impact of knowledge sharing on innovative work behavior of Vietnam telecommunications enterprises employees. Management Science Letters, 10(1), 53-62.

Oussi, R., & Chtourou, W. (2020). Social capital dimensions and employee creativity: Does cognitive style matter? Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal.

Parzefall, M.-R.; Seeck, H., & Leppänen, A. (2008). Employee innovativeness in organizations: a review of the antecedents. Finnish journal of business economics, 2(08), 165-182.

Pinchot, G., & Pellman, R. (1999). Intrapreneuring in action: A handbook for business innovation: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Pinchot III, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don't have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.

Psycinfo. (2020). Retrieved from

 apa:https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo

Puccio, G., & Grivas, C. (2009). Examining the relationship between personality traits and creativity styles. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(4), 247-255.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY, USA: The Free Press

Ruble, T. L., & Cosier, R. A. (1990). Effects of cognitive styles and decision setting on performance. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 46(2), 283-295.

Sadler-Smith, E., & Badger, B. (1998). Cognitive style, learning and innovation. Technology analysis & strategic Management, 10(2), 247-266.

Saha, S., & Sharma, R. (2020). The impact of leaders' cognitive style and creativity on organizational problem-solving. Benchmarking: An International Journal.

Sameer, Y. M. (2018). Innovative behavior and psychological capital: Does positivity make any difference? Journal of Economics & Management, 32, 75-101.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.

Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Shanker, R.; Bhanugopan, R.; Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of vocational behavior, 100, 67-77.

Sinha, N., & Srivastava, K. B. (2013). Association of personality, work values and socio-cultural factors with intrapreneurial orientation. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22(1), 97-113.

Siregar, Z. M. E.; Suryana, E. A., & Senen, S. H. (2019). Factors influencing innovative work behavior: an individual factors perspective. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(9), 324-327.

Sparrow, P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2002). The competent organisation: A psychological analysis of the strategic management process.

Streufert, S., & Nogami, G. Y. (1989). Cognitive style and complexity: Implications for I/O psychology.

Strobl, A.; Matzler, K.; Nketia, B. A., & Veider, V. (2020). Individual innovation behavior and firm-level exploration and exploitation: how family firms make the most of their managers. Review of Managerial Science, 14(4), 809-844.

Subotic, M.; Maric, M.; Mitrovic, S., & Mesko, M. (2018). Differences between adaptors and innovators in the context of entrepreneurial potential dimensions. Kybernetes.

Thurlings, M.; Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of educational research, 85(3), 430-471.

Tullett, A. D. (1997). Cognitive style: Not culture's consequence. European Psychologist, 2(3), 258.

Tullett, A. D., & Kirton, M. J. (1995). Further evidence for the independence of Adaptive-Innovative (AI) cognitive style from national culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 393-396.Urbano, D., & Turró, A. (2013). Conditioning factors for corporate entrepreneurship: an in (ex) ternal approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 379-396.

Van Hootegem, A.; Niesen, W., & De Witte, H. (2019). Does job insecurity hinder innovative work behaviour? A threat rigidity perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1), 19-29.

Wang, H.; Wang, L., & Liu, C. (2018). Employee competitive attitude and competitive behavior promote job-crafting and performance: A two-component dynamic model. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2223.

West, M. (2001). The human team: Basic motivations and innovations. Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology: Vol. 2. In: London: Sage.

Williamson, J. M.; Lounsbury, J. W., & Han, L. D. (2013). Key personality traits of engineers for innovation and technology development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(2), 157-168.

Witkin, H. A.; Moore, C. A.; Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of educational research, 47(1), 1-64.

Wojtczuk-Turek, A., & Turek, D. (2015). Innovative behaviour in the workplace: The role of HR flexibility, individual flexibility and psychological capital: the case of Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management.

Wu, C.-H.; Parker, S. K.; & De Jong, J. P. (2014). Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511-1534.

Yi, M. Y.; Fiedler, K. D., & Park, J. S. (2006). Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT‐based innovations: Comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Sciences, 37(3), 393-426.

Yu, M.-C.; Zheng, X.-T.; Wang, G. G.; Dai, Y., & Yan, B. (2018). When does motivation to learn reduce innovative behavior? An examination of mediated-moderation model. Baltic Journal of Management.

Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.

Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.

Zhu, H.; Djurjagina, K., & Leker, J. (2014). Innovative behaviour types and their influence on individual crowdsourcing performances. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(06), 1440015.