Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Management Department, Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 MSc. Student, Public management, Department of Management, Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, Iran

3 PhD Student, Public management, Organizational Behavioral, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

 
1- INTRODUCTION
In modern communities, the importance of women’s participation is to such an extent that achieving development is unexpected without their presence. Women play a remarkable role in the success of organizations due to a set of personality and innate characteristics, including a broad vision of the future, high administrative discipline, and their ability to motivate their colleagues and communicate with them as the life of an organization depends on the accurate performance of its personnel. Another critical factor in the success of organizations is the existence of employees who go beyond their job descriptions to help their colleagues. Though studies have shown that women are more likely than men to be involved in helping behaviors others argue that helping behaviors bring about challenges like the risk of emotional exhaustion or the reduced power of the helpful party to complete their official duties. Nonetheless, investigations have shown that employees who achieve success in their work may have more cognitive resources to participate in social behaviors and perform their occupational duties in a better way. Thus, job success can be considered an effective factor in helping behaviors and performance at work. However, some studies have shown that women experience lower levels of energy and enthusiasm at work. One of the most basic causes of that situation is the unfair interference of biological differences between men and women in occupational fields in addition to stereotypical attitudes and prejudices. an important consideration that should not be overlooked is that the feelings of security, justice, self-sufficiency, and autonomy matter a lot for women and increase their efficiency at work. Consequently, female employees’ mental security is a matter that requires urgent attention. On the other hand, knowledge is one of the main resources that each organization can utilize to achieve and maintain a competitive advantage, and the role played by women should not be overlooked in that regard. Though managers expect their employees to freely share their knowledge, it should not be forgotten that knowledge hiding is a common phenomenon, as well, and can significantly harm relationships in workplaces. Based on the above discussion, the present study contributed to the literature on organizational behavior and human resources in the field of women. First, it referred to the role of mental security as it could create a positive atmosphere and reduce the negative consequence of knowledge hiding, with a remarkable role in enhancing the efficiency of individuals and their colleagues at work. Another contribution of the present study concerned the role of female employees’ attitudes in professional relationships.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Knowledge hiding refers to a conscious attempt by people to hide or prevent expressing knowledge that has been requested by someone else. Mental security indicates the feeling that people can present and utilize their abilities without any fear of losing their faces or positions or experiencing other negative consequences. The relationship between knowledge hiding and mental security can be illustrated using Bem’s Self-perception theory. The theory argues that people are involved in a process of self-attribution after carrying out a certain behavior and contemplating the action and the conditions leading to it. Scholars believe this can be attributed to the area of hidden knowledge in which the lack of mental security or similar conditions (for the individuals themselves or other people) extensively specifies the conditions under which hidden behaviors occur.
Success is defined as a psychological condition where people experience both feelings of liveliness and learning in their workplaces. Liveliness and joy can be considered the energy coming from job attachment, while learning is the result of acquiring new skills and knowledge. In other words, when employees are provided with working conditions having certain resources like communication and knowledge resources or social structure characteristics like information sharing and an atmosphere of respect, they are likely to experience job success.
The existence of mental security reduces employees’ likely concerns and allows them to concentrate on their duties. Moreover, it drives them toward active participation in communicative acts and the collection of feedback from others and boosts dynamic social interactions among employees. Thus, it can be claimed that mental security is a prerequisite for employees’ success at work.
Helping behaviors are defined as voluntary assistance offered to colleagues to fulfill one’s goals or prevent the emergence of problems, while job performance can be considered the intended values of an organization that people carry out within a specified period. Employees who experience job success are more likely to develop in their jobs, have more enthusiasm toward their positions, and, at the same time, improve their relationships with their colleagues. Thus, they are expected to show more helping behaviors. In this way, job success makes employees keep away from egocentrism and help others out of altruism. Job success is accompanied by feelings of liveliness and learning, which in turn result in improved performance. Thus, job success is a significant factor influencing the emergence of helping behaviors and the improvement of individual performance.
Organizational pessimism is a negative reflection of one’s attitudes and beliefs toward an organization. People who have pessimistic views toward their organizations are more likely to hide their knowledge due to risky or uncertain conditions so that they may preserve their sense of mental security.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
The present research was an applied study in terms of purpose, and in terms of method, it was a survey. The variables were investigated using the statistics standardized in the previous studies. Moreover, the validity of the constructs of the utilized questionnaires was evaluated using the confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS, and the significance of the items relevant to the intended constructs was confirmed. The level of analysis in the study was individual. The statistical population was comprised of all female employees in the public offices of Mashhad, Iran, out of whom 386 questionnaires were collected. The data were analyzed using various statistical procedures, including Pearson’s correlation coefficient to calculate the zero-order correlation coefficients and Structural Equation Modeling to investigate the fit of the structural equation model with the collected data.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
As a prerequisite for the utilization of latent variables in structural equation modeling is the existence of a correlation between variables, Pearson’s correlation analysis was carried out. The obtained coefficients indicated that the pairwise relationship between all variables was significant at p<0.01. Moreover, the factor loadings of the items of the questionnaire were calculated using the confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS. As all factor loadings were significant in the fit model of confirmatory factor analysis, no item was eliminated from the analysis stage. Furthermore, all fit indicators were investigated, and it was shown that they enjoyed convenient fit. The hypotheses were investigated using p-value and t-value, and it was shown that, for all hypotheses in the study, the values obtained for the first and second indicators were below 0.05 and beyond the range of ±1.96, respectively. The moderating role of organizational pessimism was investigated using the adjusted regression analysis, and the hypothesized moderating impact was confirmed.
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
The present study aimed to investigate causal relationships between knowledge hiding, mental security, job success, and employees’ pessimism toward their organizations, and the data were collected from female employees in public offices in Mashhad, Iran. As predicted by the first hypothesis, it was shown that knowledge hiding negatively affects the mental security of female employees. In this way, it could be argued that hiding prevented organizational development due to its negative impacts on mental security. Concerning the second hypothesis, it was shown that knowledge hiding reduces job success. To reduce knowledge hiding, managers of human resources are suggested to establish contexts like work groups so that employees can both express their views and get familiar with what they should and should do at work. The third finding of the study showed that mental security had a significant impact on employees’ job success. Thus, it could be argued that as the positive resources created at the workplace increase, employees are more likely to actualize their capabilities toward effective behaviors. Concerning the fourth and fifth hypotheses, the effect of job success on job performance and organizational citizenship behavior was confirmed. Testing the mediating variables showed that mental security mediated the relationship between knowledge hiding and job success. Moreover, the mediating role of job success in the relationship between knowledge hiding and job performance and helping behaviors was confirmed. Ultimately, the moderating role of organizational pessimism was confirmed. The results showed that increasing organizational pessimism exacerbated the negative impacts of knowledge hiding on mental security. As employees’ pessimistic views indicate that justice and honesty are missing according to them (or may reduce in the future), managers need to ensure their employees that such basic principles will never be violated and take steps toward the expansion of justice and equity in their organizations.

Keywords

References
Aiken, L. S.; West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. sage.‏
Andersson, M.; Moen, O., & Brett, P. O. (2020). The organizational climate for psychological safety: Associations with SMEs’ innovation capabilities and innovation performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 55, 101554.
Atwater, L. E.; Waldman, D. A., Atwater, D., & Cartier, P. (2000). An upward feedback field experiment: supervisors' cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates. Personnel Psychology53(2), 275-297.‏
Azam azadeh, A. (2007). Women employment Tendency towards work and job gratification. Journal of Shiite women, 3(9), 221. (In Persian)
Bari, M. W.; Qurrah-tul-ain, Abrar, M., & Fanchen, M. (2020). Employees’ responses to psychological contract breach: The mediating role of organizational cynicism. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 0143831X20958478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X20958478
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-Perception Theory11Development of self-perception theory was supported primarily by a grant from the National Science Foundation (GS 1452) awarded to the author during his tenure at Carnegie-Mellon University. (L. B. T.-A. in E. S. P. Berkowitz (ed.); Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Academic Press.
Bolino, M. C.; Hsiung, H.-H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 56.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human performance10(2), 99-109.‏
Bridges, J. S. (1989). Sex differences in occupational values. Sex Roles, 20(3), 205–211.
Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x
Černe, M.; Nerstad, C. G. L., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2013). What Goes Around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0122
Chiaburu, D. S.; Peng, A. C., Oh, I.-S., Banks, G. C., & Lomeli, L. C. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.03.007
Choi, B. K., & Moon, H. K. (2016). Prosocial motive and helping behavior: examining helping efficacy and instrumentality. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
Collins, B. J. (2016). Fair? I don’t care: examining the moderating effect of workplace cynicism on the relationship between interactional fairness and perceptions of organizational support from a social exchange perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816667896
Connelly, C. E.; Černe, M., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2019). Understanding knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 779–782.
Connelly, C. E., & Kelloway, K. . (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310485815
Connelly, C. E.; Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64–88.
Coverman, S. (1989). Role overload, role conflict, and stress: Addressing consequences of multiple role demands. Social Forces, 67(4), 965–982.
De Clercq, D.; Rahman, Z., & Haq, I. U. (2019). Explaining helping behavior in the workplace: The interactive effect of family-to-work conflict and Islamic work ethic. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4), 1167–1177.
Dean, J. W.;  Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533230
Doll, J. L., & Rosopa, P. J. (2015). Workplace romances: examining attitudes experience, conscientiousness, and policies. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2012-0368
Ebrahimpour, H.; Mokabberi, A. H., Riva, D., & Roshandel Arbatani, T. (2011). The media and glass ceiling: Explanation of television impact on the women promotion to the managerial levels. Journal of Public Administration, 3(6), 1–18. (in Persian)
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 23–43.
Elahi, N. S.;  Abid, G., Arya, B., & Farooqi, S. (2020). Workplace behavioral antecedents of job performance: Mediating role of thriving. The Service Industries Journal, 40(11–12), 755–776.
Esmaeili, M. R., & Seidzadeh, H. (2017). The survey of job satisfaction eeffect on performance with mediating role of organizational loyalty. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 25(83), 51–68. (in Persian)
Farrell, S. K., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2007). Organizational citizenship behavior and gender: expectations and attributions for performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1).
Fathipour, P., & Rasoulzadeh Aghdam, S. (2017). Evaluation of job and family-work conflict among employed women in governmental institutions of Tabriz. Sociological Studies, 10(36), 31-48. (In Persian)
Fornell, C., & Lacker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transportation research part B, University of Michigan37, 1-25.
Fernández‐Ballesteros, R.; Díez‐Nicolás, J., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2002). Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. Applied Psychology, 51(1), 107–125.
Frazier, M. L., Tupper, C., & Fainshmidt, S. (2016). The path (s) to employee trust in direct supervisor in nascent and established relationships: A fuzzy set analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior37(7), 1023-1043.
Frazier, M. L., & Tupper, C. (2018). Supervisor prosocial motivation, employee thriving, and helping behavior: A trickle-down model of psychological safety. Group & Organization Management, 43(4), 561–593.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218.
Gahlan, V. S., & Singh, K. (2014). The effect of role overload and role ambiguity on job performance of it professionals in india. IUP Journal of Management Research, 13(3).
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
Guan, X., & Frenkel, S. (2020). Organizational support and employee thriving at work: exploring the underlying mechanisms. Personnel Review, 50(3), 935–953. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2019-0569
He, P.; Sun, R., Zhao, H., Zheng, L., & Shen, C. (2020). Linking work-related and non-work-related supervisor–subordinate relationships to knowledge hiding: A psychological safety lens. Asian Business & Management, 1–22.
Hernaus, T.;  Cerne, M., Connelly, C., Vokic, N. P., & Škerlavaj, M. (2018). Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: when competitive individuals are asked to collaborate. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Hirak, R.; Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 107–117.
Hislop, D.; Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. Oxford university press.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307
Huber, G. P. (2001). Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies. European Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000399.
Iezi, N.; Pourkiani, M., Sheikhi, A., bigzadeh, F. (2017). Employees' Performance pattern representation based on cultural intelligence and personality traits using mediation of cross-cultural adaptation (case study: Tehran Oil Refining company). Public Administration Perspaective, 9(1), 87-108. (In Persian)
Jahangiri, J., & Shokri Zadeh, T. (2010). Investigating The effect of social capital on the performance of women’s non-governmental organizations from the perspective of members in Shiraz. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society, 3(1), 105–120. (In Persian)
Jiang, Z.; Hu, X., Wang, Z., & Jiang, X. (2019). Knowledge hiding as a barrier to thriving: The mediating role of psychological safety and moderating role of organizational cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 800–818. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2358
Kamali Pour, N.; Shojaei, S., Samiei, R., & Azma, F. (2019). Investigating the factors affecting knowledge hiding with emphasis on exclusion. Public Administration Perspaective, 10(2), 216–237. (In Persian)
Kamaruddin, S.; Omar, K., Saputra, J., Shakur, E., Rahim, N., & Razal, M. (2021). Determinants of female employees’ job performance in Malaysia. Management Science Letters, 11(1), 233–238.
Koopman, J.; Lanaj, K., & Scott, B. A. (2016). Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 414–435.
Kuvaas, B.; Buch, R., & Dysvik, A. (2016). Performance management: Perceiving goals as invariable and implications for perceived job autonomy and work performance. Human Resource Management55(3), 401-412.‏
Lin, M.; Zhang, X., Ng, B. C. S., & Zhong, L. (2020). To empower or not to empower? Multilevel effects of empowering leadership on knowledge hiding. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 89, 102540.
Liu, F.; Dutta, D. K., & Park, K. (2021). From external knowledge to competitive advantage: absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the mediating role of labour productivity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(1), 18–30.
Lou, T., & Ye, M. (2019). Studying on the impact of perceived overqualification on work engagement: The moderating role of future work self salience and mediating role of thriving at work. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(8), 24–36.
Mahmoudian, S. (2016). An examination of the barriers to women’s participating in managerial levels of education organization in Iran. Educational Developement of Jundishapur, 7(2), 20–25. (In Persian)
Mahmudi,  N. M. (2008). A Study of women’s situation on employment and management stressing on women’s educational improvement. Social Sciences, 14(38.39), 133–171. (In Persian)
Molaei, P.; Alvani, M., Zahedi, S. ., & Alinezhad, A. (2020). A meta - analysis on the obstacles to women’s promotion to the levels of governance in Iranian government agencies. Journal of Career and Organization Consulting, 12(42), 199–224. (In Persian)
Morrison, R. (2007). Gender differences in the relationship between workplace friendships and organizational outcomes.
Naghdi, A., & Tourkman, K. (2017). The Study of job conflicts among females organization stuff(The case of selected educational formations in Hamedan). Journal of Applied Sociology, 28(3), 219–231. (In Persian)
Navazeni, B., & Yazdi, A. (2011). Management challenges for iranian women: a case study of imam khomeini international university as a governmental organization. Journal of Political science Association, 6(1), 201. (In Persian)
Neves, P. (2012). Organizational cynicism: Spillover effects on supervisor–subordinate relationships and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 965–976.
Novitasari, D.; Sasono, I., & Asbari, M. (2020). Work-family conflict and worker’s performance during Covid-19 pandemic: What is the role of readiness to change mentality. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 3(4), 122–134.
Pandey, J. (2019). Factors affecting job performance: an integrative review of literature. Management Research Review, 42(2), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2018-0051
Paterson, T. A.; Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 434–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1907
Peng, Y.; Ma, J., Zhang, W., & Jex, S. (2021). Older and less deviant? the paths through emotional labor and organizational cynicism. Work, Aging and Retirement, 7(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa017
Podsakoff, N. P.; Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. In Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 94, Issue 1, pp. 122–141). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079
Podsakoff, P. M.; Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. In Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 82, Issue 2, pp. 262–270). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262
Porath, C.; Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250–275.
Purvanova, R. K., & Muros, J. P. (2010). Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 168–185.
Rahimnia, F., & Ghaderi, F. (2020). Exploring the effect of perceived forgiveness climate on female practitioners of tourism industry. Social Studies in Tourism, 8(15), 1-26. (in Persian)
Rhodes, L. M. (2019). Thriving at work: A call center study [Franklin University]. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=frank1553730147335996
Riaz, S.; Xu, Y., & Hussain, S. (2018). Understanding employee innovative behavior and thriving at work: a chinese perspective. In Administrative Sciences  (Vol. 8, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8030046
Semedo, A. S. D.; Coelho, A. F. M., & Ribeiro, N. M. P. (2016). Effects of authentic leadership, affective commitment and job resourcefulness on employees’ creativity and individual performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(8), 1038–1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2015-0029
Shams, G., & Khaligian, S. (2014). The effect of secure-base leadership components on the staff psychological safety: the role of leadership effectiveness. Quarterly Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 9(4), 34–55. (in Persian)
Spreitzer, G.; Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537–549.
Sreitzer, G.; Porath, C. L., & Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability. How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.009
Taleghani, G.-R.; Pourezzat, A.-A., & Faraji, B. (2009). Survey on the Effect of Glass Ceiling on Decrease of Women Empowerment in Iran Power Development Co. (IPDC). Journal of Public Administration, 1(2), 98-102. (in Persian)
Tavasoli, A., & Rafeie Khonani, F. (2008). A survey about the factors affecting women s tendency toward getting a job outside the home (A case study of Medical services insurance organization). Journal of Sociological Researches, 2(2), 5. (in Persian)
Toheed, H.; Turi, J. A., & Ramay, M. I. (2019). Exploring the Consequences of Organizational Cynicism. International Journal of European Studies, 3(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijes.20190301.18.
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management journal41(1), 108-119.‏
Vinarski-Peretz, H., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Linking care felt to engagement in innovative behaviors in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological conditions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018241
Wallace, J. C.; Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. (2016). A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate. Journal of Management, 42(4), 982–1004.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617.
Xu, A. J.; Loi, R., & Chow, C. W. C. (2019). What threatens retail employees’ thriving at work under leader-member exchange? The role of store spatial crowding and team negative affective tone. Human Resource Management, 58(4), 371–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21959
Yaghoub Pour, N.; KuhiKhor, M., Kamalian, A. R., & Tajpour, M. (2018). investigate the effect of Organizational Mobbing behaviors on job and Organizational Attitude. Quarterly Journal of Management of Governmental Organizations, 6(2), 117. (In Persian)
Yan, Y.; Davison, R. M., & Mo, C. (2013). Employee creativity formation: The roles of knowledge seeking, knowledge contributing and flow experience in Web 2.0 virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1923–1932. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.007.
Yue, Y.; Wang, K. L., & Groth, M. (2017). Feeling bad and doing good: The effect of customer mistreatment on service employee's daily display of helping behaviors. Personnel Psychology70(4), 769-808.‏
Zhang, Y.; Fang, Y., Wei, K. K., & Chen, H. (2010). Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management30(5), 425-436.
Zeng, H.; Zhao, L., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Inclusive leadership and taking-charge behavior: roles of psychological safety and thriving at work   . In Frontiers in Psychology,11,62.
CAPTCHA Image