Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Industrial Management, Department of Management Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Management Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Management Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract

 
1- INTRODUCTION
Due to the contradictions of lean and agile approaches and meanwhile, their synergy, choosing, combining, and implementing these approaches with specific goals, strategies, and limitations is a key challenge for supply chain managers. The current research aimed to develop a dynamic system for implementing lean and agile approaches in the supply chain.
 
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Supply chain management includes the planning and management of all activities involved in the supply chain and is considered a vital factor in the competitiveness of organizations. Lean and agile approaches are among the popular approaches in supply chain management. Lean philosophy seeks to eliminate waste and reduce costs based on more output with fewer resources according to customers' needs. Governing lean thinking and principles in the value stream is called lean supply chain management. Quick response to changes in demand, in terms of volume and variety, is called agility. The concept of this approach refers to choosing the right strategy in conditions of uncertainty and providing products and services to customers at the right time and place. Empowering new competencies to respond quickly and effectively to the market is called agile supply chain management. These two approaches have different drivers, prerequisites, and strategies, and each one pursues a specific goal.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
The present study is in the category of qualitative-quantitative research. Based on the stages of research in the conceptual development stage, the model is placed in the category of qualitative research. At this stage, by content analysis of the research background, factors affecting the selection of agile and lean approaches have been identified. This stage includes four main steps: problem definition, data collection, analysis, and presentation of the final model. In the quantitative stage, using the system dynamics method, using the factors obtained from the first stage and lean and agile strategies, a model has been presented to evaluate the performance and choose the appropriate strategies in different conditions. Causal models and state flow have been drawn and model evaluation tests, structure evaluation, and sensitivity analysis have been done to confirm the model validity. Finally, different scenarios have been simulated and analyzed in this model. The information required for modeling and simulating the model has been collected from the Yazd Rubber Industries Complex.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
In the qualitative stage and after content analysis by reviewing articles and zigzag coding, 106 codes from 31 studies were identified as open codes. In this study, it was done. By repeatedly reviewing the identified primary codes and comparing them, the codes with common content and concepts were classified under one concept. In this way, 40 subgroups were extracted. Finally, these codes were classified into 17 groups and 4 general levels of environmental, organization-related, product-related, and functional factors. After extracting the influencing factors on the selection of lean and agile approaches, the flow model has been presented and evaluated in Vansim software. After obtaining the valid model, by changing different variables and scenario analysis, approaches have been analyzed in three different scenarios. A comparison of selected scenarios and policies for each condition shows that, as a strategic strategy, eliminating waste is a priority in all scenarios.
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
The current research has theoretical and practical implications. This research is a response to the need for a systematic and comprehensive framework of vital factors in choosing appropriate agile and lean approaches. In this article, the knowledge available in the literature about the agile and lean approach in the supply chain is organized to develop a model for choosing appropriate approaches. On the other hand, organizations do not need fixed degrees of leanness or agility in different situations. The presented dynamic model can examine specific strategies of lean and agile approaches in different conditions and finally provide certain degrees of lean and agility. In the situation that in previous studies, the combination of these two approaches is usually discussed and less attention is paid to the effect of conditions on the level of leanness and agility. Although this study tried to present a dynamic model for choosing lean and agile strategies with a comprehensive look at all conditions, due to the existence of other approaches such as resilient and green, future studies may examine other effective factors and strategies to present a more comprehensive model.

Keywords

©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

References
Abdollahi, M.; Razmi, J., & Arvan, M. (2014). The added parts after revision are highlighted in the passage. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 679–690.
Agarwal, A.; Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(1), 211–225.
Agarwal, A.; Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 443–457.
Al Humdan, E.; Shi, Y., & Behnia, M. (2020). Supply chain agility: a systematic review of definitions, enablers and performance implications. international journal of physical distribution and logistics management, 50(2), 287–312.
Ambe, I. M. (2012). Determining an optimal supply chain strategy. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 126–147.
Ambe, I. M. (2017). Strategies of light vehicle manufacturers in South Africa based on supply chain decision drivers. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 9(3), 188–206.
Amiri, M.; Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J., & Yousefi Hanoomarvar, A. (2018). Determining the optimal combination of larg supply chain strategies using swot analysis, multi-criteria decision-making techniques and game theory. Industrial Management Journal, 10(2), 221–246.
Arora, A.; Arora, A., & Sivakumar, K. (2014). Relationships among supply chain strategies, organizational performance, and technological and market turbulences. International Journal of Logistics Management, 25(1).
Bezuidenhout, C. N. (2004). Quantifying the degree of leanness and agility at any point within a supply chain C. The Eletronic Library, 34(1), 1–5.
Birhanu, D.; Lanka, K., & Neelakanteswara Rao, A. (2014). A survey of classifications in supply chain strategies. Procedia Engineering, 97, 2289–2297.
Cabral, I.; Grilo, A., & Cruz-machado, V. (2012). A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, April 2013, 37–41.
Caniato, F.; Caridi, M.; Crippa, L., & Moretto, A. (2012). Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: An exploratory case based research. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 659–670.
Carvalho, H.; Azevedo, S., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2014). Trade-offs among lean, agile, resilient and green paradigms in supply chain management: A case study approach. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 242 LNEE, 2, 953–968.
Carvalho, H.; Duarte, S., & Machado, V. C. (2011). Lean, agile, resilient and green: divergencies and synergies. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(2), 151–179.
Chan, A. T. L.; Ngai, E. W. T., & Moon, K. K. L. (2017). The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 486–499.
Christopher, M. (2000). The Agile Supply Chain: Competing in Volatile Markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37–44.
Fahimnia, B., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2016). Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 91, 306–324.
Fisher, M. L. (1997). What Is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product? 99–130.
Garcia-Buendia, N.; Moyano-Fuentes, J.; Maqueira-Marín, J. M., & Cobo, M. J. (2021). 22 Years of Lean Supply Chain Management: a science mapping-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 59(6), 1901–1921.
Gligor, D. M.; Esmark, C. L., & Holcomb, M. C. (2015). Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? Journal of Operations Management, 33(34), 71–82.
Hallgren, M., & Olhager, J. (2009). Lean and agile manufacturing: external and internal drivers and performance outcomes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(10), 976–999.
Jajja, S. M. S.; Kannan, V. R., Shaukat, A., & Hassan, S. Z. (2016). Supply Chain Strategy and the Role of Suppliers: Evidence from the Indian Sub-Continent. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(7), 1658–1676.
Jamali, G.; Asl, E. K.; Zolfani, S. H., & Šaparauskas, J. (2017). Analysing larg supply chain management competitive strategies in iranian cement industries. Economics and Management, 20(3), 70–83.
Kusmantini, T.; Haryono, T.; Untoro, W., & Setiawan, A. I. (2018). Strategic consensus between functions and the role of supply chain technology as moderator. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(4), 735–748.
Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Review, 44(3), 105–119.
Lenort, R., & Wicher, P. (2012). Agile versus resilient supply chains: Commonalities and differences. Congress Proceedings - CLC 2012: Carpathian Logistics Congress, 558–564.
Lotfi, M., & Saghiri, S. (2017). Disentangling resilience, agility and leanness: Conceptual development and empirical analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 168–197.
Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015). An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Resources Policy, 46, 37–50.
Mao, Z., Li, X., Qi, E., & Jia, F. (2009). Research on supply strategy driven factors of SDN based on product and service characteristics. 2009 IEEE/INFORMS International Conference on Service Operations, Logistics and Informatics, SOLI 2009, 713–717.
Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2(1), 54–61.
Mehrsai, A.; Thoben, K., & Scholz-Reiter, B. (2013). Bridging lean to agile production logistics using autonomous carriers in bridging lean to agile production logistics using autonomous carriers in pull-flow. International Journal of Production Research, December.
Negri, M.; Cagno, E.; Colicchia, C., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, February, 1–29.
Ojha, R. (2021). Enablers of lean for manufacturing excellence: an interpretive structural modelling and analysis. Vision26(1), 90-104. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Piya, S.; Shamsuzzoha, A.; Khadem, M., & Al-Hinai, N. (2020). Identification of critical factors and their interrelationships to design agile supply chain: special focus to oil and gas industries. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(3), 263–281.
Prajogo, D.; Mena, C., & Nair, A. (2018). The fit between supply chain strategies and practices: a contingency approach and comparative analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(1), 168–180.
Qi, Y.; Huo, B.; Wang, Z., & Yeung, H. Y. J. (2017). The impact of operations and supply chain strategies on integration and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 162–174.
Ruiz-Benitez, R.; López, C., & Real, J. C. (2018). The lean and resilient management of the supply chain and its impact on performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 190–202.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research, Sage publications.
Tortorella, G. L.; Miorando, R., & Marodin, G. (2017). Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 98–112.
Uhrin, Á.; Moyano-Fuentes, J., & Cámara, S. B. (2020). Firm risk and self-reference on past performance as main drivers of lean production implementation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(3), 458–478.
Vázquez-Bustelo, D.; Avella, L., & Fernández, E. (2007). Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: Empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(12), 1303–1332.
Vinodh, S., & Aravindraj, S. (2013). Evaluation of leagility in supply chains using fuzzy logic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1186–1195.
Vonderembse, M. A.; Uppal, M.; Huang, S. H., & Dismukes, J. P. (2006). Designing supply chains: Towards theory development. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 223–238.
Walter, A. T. (2021). Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization. In Management Review Quarterly, 71(2).
Wolfswinkel, J. F.; Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45–55.
Yusuf, Y. Y.; M. Sarhadi, & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes Y.Y. International Journal of Production Economics, 33–43.
Zhu, M., & Gao, H. (2021). The antecedents of supply chain agility and their effect on business performance: an organizational strategy perspective. Operations Management Research, 14(2), 166–176.
Zimmermann, R.; Ferreira, L. M. D. F., & Moreira, A. C. (2020). An empirical analysis of the relationship between supply chain strategies, product characteristics, environmental uncertainty and performance. Supply Chain Management, 25(3), 375–391.
CAPTCHA Image