نوع مقاله : مقالات

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی

2 دانشگاه امام صادق (ع)،

3 دانشگاه بوعلی سینا

چکیده

 تصمیم­گیری اخلاقی، یک فرآیند چند وجهی است و این پدیده به عنوان چالشی برای سازمان‌های مردم نهاد تلقی می‌شود. هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر فهم و شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های تشکیل دهنده و مؤثر بر تصمیم­گیری اخلاقی افراد و ارائه مدلی بومی برای سازمان‌های مردم نهاد و داوطلبانه می‌باشد. ماهیت این پژوهش اکتشافی بوده که به روش بنیادی و با استفاده از رویکرد نظریه داده بنیاد انجام گرفته است. مشارکت‌کنندگان در این پژوهش شامل مدیران و افراد کارشناس در سازمان­های مورد مطالعه در استان همدان بوده که به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و با تکنیک گلوله برفی شناسایی شدند که با توجه به اصل اشباع و کفایت داده‌ها، در مجموع با 20 نفر مصاحبه شد. یافته‌های حاصل از طراحی مدل پارادایمی نشان داد، تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی تحت تأثیر مجموعه‌ای از عوامل بینفردی، سازمانی و فراسازمانی و مذهبی صورت می‌گیرد. درنهایت نتیجه‌گیری شد که شرایط مذکور به‌طورکلی موجب شده‌اند پدیده‌ای به نام تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی توسعه و در این نوع و شکل از سازمان‌ها مورد توجه افراد واقع شود و پیامدهای چنین تصمیماتی، منعکس کننده رفتار اخلاقی مثبت، ایجاد انگیزه مثبت در ذینفعان و مردم، انضباط اقتصادی و انضباط اجتماعی در جامعه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying the affecting factors of ethical decision making in non-governmental organizations

نویسنده [English]

  • Meysam Latifi 2

1 Islamic Azad university

3 Bu Ali Sina University

چکیده [English]

Extended abstract
1- INTRODUCTION
Paying attention to the ethics concept and its impact on organizations’ decision-making systems has been widely increased. one of the most effective ways to entering ethical issues into everyday human affairs is to consider ethics in decision making. the ethical decision-making process begins when people are faced with a complex moral situation, they judge that situation, and then they shape their behavioral intentions. this process is influenced by individual, situational, and subject-oriented factors. in organizations like non-governmental ones (NGOs) where managers pay more attention to decision making, the modeling of ethical decision-making is a special and undeniable thing. in recent years, these organizations have been faced with an upward trend of non-wise and sometimes unethical decision-making. the present study contributes to the decision-making process by developing a native model for ngos to identify affecting factors of ethical decision-making. the human resource and their activities of these organizations are different from the others because of differences in structure, culture, and voluntary nature of the workforce.
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
On the one hand, decision-making is a basis for all managerial tasks. on the other hand, ethical decision-making is a remarkable and multi-faceted subject in the literature on business ethics. the problem is that ethical principles cannot be transformed into simple mechanisms to guide the organizations' managers and employees. this issue especially applies to NGOs. NGO that is a non-profit and non-political organization and has free membership refers to those voluntary establishments shaped by several non-governmental real people in compliance with the relevant regulations. based on studies on the ethical decision-making process, this process is influenced by three individual, structural, and contextual factors. another research flow implies that environmental conditions encompassing political, economic, social, and cultural factors may affect the strength and weakness of ethical decision-making rules in businesses and organizations. since there exists no comprehensive national study on affecting factors of ethical decision-making in iranian ngos, the current research explores the causal, intervening, and contextual factors of ethical decision-making in these organizations. the ultimate purpose of this research was to develop a native model for ethical decision-making in Iranian NGOs.
3- METHODOLOGY
In terms of method, this research is a qualitative study of having an interpretive paradigm with the grounded theory for data analysis strategy.  instead of focusing on a linear process, the main focus of the grounded theory for data interpretation is on a continuous sweep between data collection and data analysis. on this basis, the concepts gradually emerge from codes, categories from concepts, and theory from categories. the method for sampling was purposeful, and participants were selected by conducting the snowball technique with as much variety as possible. the sample members were the managers and experts in hamadan province and came from top ngos operating in the fields of health, charity, education, environment, culture, and art. seventeen semi-structured interviews reached theoretical saturation but interviewing process continued to 20, and obtained data were analyzed using MAXQDA v.10 software. In terms of validity and reliability, research findings were evaluated and confirmed by two measures of feeding back the results to participants and obtaining the colleagues' opinions.
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Research results led to a native model with the core category of “developing the ethical decision-making” comprised of 17 main components and six dimensions. this model is the result of individuals' lived experiences and their mental meanings of the central phenomenon. in total, identified dimensions and categories as the main antecedents and outcomes of the process of ethical decision-making in NGOs imply that interpersonal factors, along with the other organizational, extra-organizational, and religious factors, develop ethical decision making.
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
In the beginning, interpersonal factors are the causal conditions for the initiation of decision-making in NGOs. these factors are created by effectively communicating with individuals, managing them, and team building. organizational factors are contextual conditions comprised of optimal use of resources, organizational intelligence, cultural intelligence, and planning awareness and knowledge. extra-organizational and religious factors, as intermediary conditions, affect the individuals’ actions in making ethical decisions. individual-personality factors, as strategic conditions, are purposeful activities in response to the core category that are affected by causal, contextual, and intermediary conditions. in managers’ and experts’ opinions, the outcomes of ethical decisions are things like positive ethical behavior, positively motivating the stakeholders and individuals, and economic and social discipline.
Based on obtained results, NGOs can facilitate the ethical decision-making process and adhere more to the principles of professional ethics. this research encompasses all the organizational levels that are the operational employees, supervisors, and top managers. to improve the ethics in these organizations, the managers are recommended to hold workshops, codify ethical charter, and teach problem-solving and decision-making skills to all the organization members.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Decision making
  • Ethical Decision -Making
  • NGOs
  • Grounded theory
References
 
Azar, A.; Rabieh, M., & Gheitasi, F. (2008). Ethics in management science, Journal of Ethics in Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 61-70. (In Persian)
Aristotle, M. (2010). Nicomachean ethics, Translated by Mohammad Hassan Lotfi, (2nd Ed,). Tehran: publication of Ney. (In Persian)
Abbaszadeh, M. (2016). A Reflection on the reliability and validity in qualitative research, Journal of Applied Sociology, 45(1). (In  Persian)
Ali Akbari, H., & Ramezani, H. (2012). Study of theoretical foundations of the issue of Islamic-based decision making, Islamic Management Scientific Journal, 20(1),149-174. (In Persian)
Barnard, Ch. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
Blicky, N. (2005). Designing social researchs, Translation: Hasan Chavashian, Tehran: publication of Ney. (In Persian)
Bommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravander, J.  & Tuttle, M.  (1987).  Behavioral model of ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4): 265-280.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4nd Ed,), MA: Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inqui Theory into Practice,39(3).
Danaie Fard, H.; Alvani, M., & Azar, A. (2013). Qualitative researchs methodology in management; a comprehensive approach, (3st ed), Tehran: publication of Saffar eshraghi. (In Persian)
Danayee Fard, H., & Emami, M. (2007). Strategies of qualitative research: Grounded theory hesitationon the idea of management, Strategic Management Thought,1(2): 69-97. (In Persian)
Faramarz Gharamalki, A. (2018). Ethical organizations in business, (11st ed), Tehran: publication of Majnon. (In Persian)
Faramarz Gharamaleki, A. (2008). Income on professional ethics, (1st ed), Tehran: publication of Saraamad. (In Persian)
Faghihi, A., & Alizadeh, M. (2015). Validity in qualitative research, Management Culture, 3(9): 5-19. (In Persian)
Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3): 87-96.
Gholipour, R. (2015). Organizational decision making and public policy, Tehran: publication of Ney. (In Persian)
Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics, Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1): 5–16.
Isazadeh, M. (2016). Legal challenges of ngos in Iran, report on the observer plan on the establishment and activities of ngos, islamic research center of the majlis, research deputy. (In Persian)
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model, Academy of Management Review, 16­­(2): 366-395.
Javadi Sadegh, H. (2016). Unethical decision making, management research and humanities research conference in Iran, research institute of management, Tehran university. (In Persian)
Khosrow Abadi, H. R., & Rezaei Manesh, B. (2015). Designing the ethical decision-making pattern for managers based on nahjolbalaghe teachings, Nahjolbalaghe Research Quarterly, 3(11): 65-94. (In Persian)
Mahdavi, Gh. H., & Alipour, S. (2010). Ethical Decision Approaches for Corporates Finance Managers, Journal of Accounting Knowledge,1(2): 33-53. (In Persian)
Mehrani, S.; Saghafi, A.; Musa Khani, M., & Sepasi, S. (2011). Effective factors on ethical decision making of iranian official accountants, Journal of Ethics in Behavioral Sciences, 6(3): 6-12. (In Persian)
Motahari, M., & Mohammad Davooddi, A. H. (2016). Ethical decision making in educational organizations, third world conference on psychology and education, law and social sciences at the beginning of the third millennium, shiraz, with the joint collaboration of azin shoushtar university of applied sciences and zarghan university. (In Persian)
    Mohammadi Eliasi, Gh.; & Badli, Z. (2015). The Impact of environmental factors on ethical decision making in start-ups, Journal of Entrepreneurial Development, 8(1): 175-193. (InPersian)
   Mohammadi Shahroudi, H.; Rahimnia, F.; Malekzadeh, Gh.; & Khorakian, A. (2019). Presentation of organizational resilience model in manufacturing companies with granded theory approach, Journal of Public Management Research, 12(41): 111-134. (InPersian)
Rahimzadeh, M. A. (2016). Non governmental organization, Tehran: publication of Tadbir Roshan. (In Persian)
Siahkol Rudi, M.; Faizi, T.; Rasouli, R., & Hozoori, J. (2015). Identification of Effective Factors on Ethical Decision-Making Managers of Payame Noor University, Journal of Governmental Administration, 7(3): 525-546. (In Persian)
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques, translated by: Buick Mohammadi, Tehran: publication of Research Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (InPersian)
Simon, H. (1960). The new science of management decision. New York: Harper and Row.
Starr, M. K. (1971). Management: A modern approach. New York: Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
Zeni, T. A.; Buckley, M. R.; Mumford, M. D., & Griffith, J. A. (2016). Making sense of ethical decision making, The Leadership Quarterly, 27(6): 838-855.