نوع مقاله : مقالات

نویسندگان

1 آزاد اسلامی علی آباد کتول

2 دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تاسمانیا، استرالیا

3 استاد، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تاسمانیا، استرالیا

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف بررسی رابطه بین جو سازمانی حمایتی و رفتارهای مشارکت جویانه مثبت مشتری با توجه به نقش میانجی رفتارهای فراوظیفه­ای مثبت مرتبط به کار شامل رفتارهای انطباقی و پیش نگر کارمند و اثر تعدیلی سرمایۀ روان‌شناختی مثبت کارکنان انجام شد. پژوهش به لحاظ هدف کاربردی و به لحاظ انجام آن توصیفی-پیمایشی بوده است. نمونه‌ها شامل 513  کارمند و560 مشتری از 60 شرکت بیمه بود که به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای و در دسترس انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه‌های سرمایه روان‌شناختی مثبت، جو سازمانی حمایتی، که توسط کارکنان پاسخ داده شدند و پرسشنامه‌های رفتار انطباقی، رفتارهای پیش نگر و رفتارهای مشارکت جویانه مثبت مشتری، که توسط مشتریان پاسخ داده شدند، استفاده گردید. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از روش معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزارهای SPSS 24  و Amos 23و همچنین روش رگرسیون با استفاده از برنامه Process Macro استفاده شد. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان داد که رفتارهای فراوظیفه­ای مثبت مرتبط به کار، نقش میانجی در رابطه بین جو سازمانی حمایتی و رفتارهای فراوظیفه‌ای مثبت مشتری ایفا می‌کنند. به علاوه، نتایج تأیید کرد که سرمایه روان‌شناختی مثبت در تعامل با جو سازمانی حمایتی بر رفتارهای پیش نگر و انطباقی کارکنان تأثیر مثبت داشته و این اثر تعاملی بر رفتارهای پیش نگر بیشتر از رفتارهای انطباقی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Mediation of employees’ positive extra-role behaviors in the relationship between supportive organizational climate and customer engagement behaviors

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sahar Siami 1
  • Martin Grimmer 2

2 Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Tasmania, Australia

چکیده [English]

Extended abstract
1- INTRODUCTION
During recent decades, customers' extra-role behaviors such as citizenship and engagement have become the focus of management studies. these behaviors result in increasing resources and decreasing organizational costs such as the cost for advertisement and human resource recruitment. customer engagement behavior is considered as an extra-role voluntary behavior during and after purchasing a product or receiving a service. thus, identifying the affecting factors of customer engagement is useful for organizations. on the other hand, the performance of frontline employees in service organizations such as insurance companies is of crucial importance because of its direct impact on perceived service quality and consequently customer satisfaction. in other words, customers assess the quality of received services and organizational performance serving as a baseline of their behavioral intentions toward the organization. therefore, understanding the factors that encourage employees to be engaged in such behaviors is critical for managers. therefore, the present research aimed to investigate the relationship between supportive organizational climate and positive customer engagement behaviors considering the mediation of employee's positive extra-role (adaptive and proactive) behaviors as well as the moderation of positive psychological capital.
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
In this study, social exchange theory has been employed to justify the relationships within the conceptual model. relying on this theory, when there is a lack of formal obligation to reciprocate; involved parties are more likely to repay the received benefits using norms of reciprocity and show citizenship behaviors. accordingly, when individuals perceive other parties' voluntary and extra-role help to satisfy their needs, they feel obligated to repay the perceived support to the person or the organization that they work for. therefore, it can be suggested that when employees perceive organizational procedures and policies as supportive, they feel obligated and committed to the organization which motivates them to reciprocate through engaging in task-related extra-role behaviors (i.e., adaptive and proactive behaviors). in the same vein, customers who perceive extra-role behaviors of employees toward themselves, try to reciprocate employees' behaviors by exerting positive engagement behaviors.
3- METHODOLOGY
A quantitative methodology was used in this study. the research objective was practical, and the study used a survey-descriptive method. the study population included employees and customers of 60 branches of 20 insurance companies located in tehran, mazandaran, and golestan provinces in iran. the study sample included 513 employees and 560 customers, which have been selected using convenience and stratified sampling techniques. to collect data, scales of positive psychological capital, supportive organizational climate, adaptive behavior, proactive behavior (rated by employees), and positive customer engagement behavior (rated by customers) were employed. structural equation modeling in amos 23 software and linear regression analysis using process macro in spss 24 were used to analyze data.


4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Results of hypothesis testing indicated that supportive organizational climate positively affects employees' adaptive and proactive behaviors. thus, a supportive organizational climate is an organizational resource that can improve employees' capability and motivation to engage in tasks requiring cognitive ability and job control. in addition to confirming the positive relationship between adaptive and proactive behaviors and customer engagement, the results confirmed the mediating effect of adaptive and proactive behaviors in the relationship between supportive organizational climate and customer engagement. it means that customers can be influenced by a supportive organizational climate based on employees' adaptive and proactive behaviors. finally, the findings confirmed the moderating effect of psychological capital on the relationship between supportive organizational climate and adaptive and proactive behaviors.
5- CONCLUSION & SUGGESTIONS
The results of the study contributed to research on supportive organizational climate and the understanding of the effect of employees' extra-role behaviors on customers' voluntary behaviors such as customer engagement. first, the findings provided new insight on the effect of supportive organizational climate on adaptive and proactive behaviors. although a few studies have considered the moderating effect of psychological capital, no study investigated the interaction between positive psychological capital and supportive organizational climate and its effect on adaptive and proactive behaviors separately and spontaneously. in line with the study findings, it is suggested to the managers of service organizations to formally or informally support employees' creative ideas and actions in delivering services to encourage them to be engaged in task-related extra-role behaviors. furthermore, managers can assure employees that there not only would not be any negative consequences for possible mistakes resulting from creative adaptive and proactive behaviors, but they would support such behaviors and, in this way, motivate employees to do so.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Supportive Organizational Climate
  • psychological capital
  • Customer Engagement Behavior
  • Extra-role Behaviors
References
Albrecht, S.; Breidahl, E., & Marty, A. (2018). Organizational resources, organizational engagement climate, and employee engagement. Career Development International, 23(1), 67-85.
Alizadeh Sani, M.; Hosseini, A., & Tabassomi, A. (2018). Impact of welfare facilities on positive psychological capital. Journal of Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 27(87), 29-44. (in persian)
Avey, J. B.; Reichard, R. J.; Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta‐analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127-152.
Ahearne, M.; Bhattacharya C. B., & Gruen T. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: expanding the role of relationship marketing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 574.
Ahmadi, Sh., & Nadi, M. A. (2019). Investigating the impact of career progression, career plateauing, affective commitment, job engagement and job burnout on employee perception of organizational justice and the intention to turnover. Transformation Management, 11(21), 105-132. (in persian)
Babakus, E.; Yavas, U., & Ashill, N. J. (2009). The role of customer orientation as a moderator of the job demand–burnout–performance relationship: A surface-level trait perspective. Journal of Retailing, 85(4), 480-492.
Berberoglu, A. (2018). Impact of organizational climate on organizational commitment and perceived organizational performance: empirical evidence from public hospitals. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 399-408.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life, transaction publishers.
Brodie, R. J.; Hollebeek, L. D.; Jurić, B., & Ilić, A. (2011). Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252-271.
Cameron, K. S., & Caza, A. (2004). Introduction: contributions to the discipline of positive organizational scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 731-739
Chan, K. W.; Gong, T.; Zhang, R., & Zhou, M. (2017). Do employee citizenship behaviors lead to customer citizenship behaviors? the roles of dual identification and service climate. Journal of Service Research, 20(3), 259-274.
Chang, K. C. (2016). Effect of services cape on customer behavioral intentions: moderating roles of service climate and employee engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 116-128.
Chen, X.; Chen, Y., & Guo, S. (2019). Relationship between organizational legitimacy and customer citizenship behavior: a social network perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 47(1), 1-12.
Chen, Q.; Wen, Z.; Kong, Y.; Niu, J., & Hau, K. T. (2017). Influence of leaders' psychological capital on their followers: multilevel mediation effect of organizational identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1776.
Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296-325.
Clapp-Smith, R.; Vogelgesang, G. R., & Avey, J. B. (2009). Authentic leadership and positive psychological capital: The mediating role of trust at the group level of analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(3), 227-240.
Cook, K. S.; Cheshire, C.; Rice, E. R., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. handbook of social psychology (pp. 61-88): Springer.
Dawkins, S.; Martin, A.; Scott, J., & Sanderson, K. (2015). Advancing conceptualization and measurement of psychological capital as a collective construct. Human Relations, 68(6), 925-949.
Dollard, M. F.; Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2012). Psychosocial safety climate moderates the job demand–resource interaction in predicting workgroup distress. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 694-704.
Eddleston, K. A.; Kellermanns, F. W., & Kidwell, R. E. (2018). Managing family members: how monitoring and collaboration affect extra‐role behavior in family firms. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 957-977.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Friend, S. B.; Johnson, J. S.; Luthans, F., & Sohi, R. S. (2016). Positive psychology in sales: integrating psychological capital. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 24(3), 306-327.
Fuller, J. B.; Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8),1089-1120.
Jones, T.; Taylor, S. F., & Bansal, H. S. (2008). Commitment to a friend, a service provider, or a service company—are they distinctions worth making? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 473-487.
Jong, A. D., & De Ruyter, K. (2004). Adaptive versus proactive behavior in service recovery: the role of self‐managing teams. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 457-491.
Jundt, D. K.; Shoss, M. K., & Huang, J. L., (2015). Individual adaptive performance in organizations: a review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), 53-71.
Garg, N.; Punia, B. K., & Jain, A. (2019). Workplace spirituality and job satisfaction: exploring mediating effect of organization citizenship behaviour. Vision, 23(3), 287-296.
Ghitulescu, B. E. (2013). Making change happen: the impact of work context on adaptive and proactive behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(2), 206-245.
Griffin, M. A.; Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: a longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 174-194.
Griffin, M. A.; Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
Grimmer, L.; Grimmer, M., & Mortimer, G. (2018). The more things change the more they stay the same: a replicated study of small retail firm resources. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 54-63.
Grimmer, M., & Miles, M. P. (2017). With the best of intentions: a large sample test of the intention‐behavior gap in pro‐environmental consumer behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(1), 2-10.
Gwinner, K. P.; Bitner, M. J.; Brown, S. W., & Kumar, A. (2005). Service customization through employee adaptiveness. Journal of Service Research, 8(2), 131-148.
Guo, L.; Decoster, S.; Babalola, M. T.; De Schutter, L.; Garba, O. A., & Riisla, K. (2018). Authoritarian leadership and employee creativity: the moderating role of psychological capital and the mediating role of fear and defensive silence. Journal of Business Research, 92, 219-230.
Gupta, M.; Shaheen, M., & Reddy, P. K. (2017). Impact of psychological capital on organizational citizenship behavior: mediation by work engagement. Journal of Management Development, 36(7), 973-983.
Hadadian, A., & mohamadzade, Z. (2016). Investigating the effect work-family conflict on burnout with the mediating effect of psychological capital in governmental banks of gonabad. Transformation Management, 6(12), 135-158. https://doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v6i12.31547. (in persion).
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications, 1-20.
Hobfoll, S. (2014). Resource caravans and resource caravan passageways: a new paradigm for trauma responding. Intervention, 12, 21-32.
Liao, H., & Chuang, A., (2004). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 41-58.
Law, R.; Dollard, M. F.; Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2011). Psychosocial safety climate as a lead indicator of workplace bullying and harassment, job resources, psychological health and employee engagement. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1782-1793.
Luthans, F.; Norman, S. M.; Avolio, B. J., & Avey, J. B. (2008). Supportive organizational climate–employee performance relationship, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 219–238.
Luthans, F.; Avolio, B. J.; Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321-349.
Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014). The role of customer engagement behavior in value co-creation: a service system perspective. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 247-261.
Kumar, V.; Rajan, B.; Gupta, S., & Dalla Pozza, I. (2019). Customer engagement in service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 138-160.
Naami, A.; Shamsi, M., & Khajeh, N. (2016). Designing and testing a model of the mediating role of learning goal orientation at the individual, group and organizational level in the relationship of transformational leadership with adaptive performance of employees of a service organization, Organizational Culture Management, 14(2), 567-587. (in persion).
Nguyen, H.; Johnson, A.; Collins, C., & Parker, S. K. (2017). Confidence matters: self‐efficacy moderates the credit that supervisors give to adaptive and proactive role behaviours. British Journal of Management, 28(2), 315-330.
Parker, S. K.; Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827-856.
Rank, J.; Carsten, J. M.; Unger, J. M., & Spector, P. E. (2007). Proactive customer service performance: relationships with individual, task, and leadership variables. Human Performance, 20(4), 363-390.
Rasouli, R. (2014). Investigating the Interventionist role of organizational atmosphere in promoting management innovation in payam noor university. Public Organization Management, 41(2), 567-587. (in persion).
Raub, S., & Liao, H. (2012). Doing the right thing without being told: joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 651-672.
Revilla-Camacho, M. Á.; Vega-Vázquez, M., & Cossío-Silva, F. J. (2015). Customer participation and citizenship behavior effects on turnover intention. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1607-1611.
Rogg, K. L.; Schmidt, D. B.; Shull, C., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Human resource practices, organizational climate, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Management, 27, 431–449.
Román, S., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of adaptive selling confidence and behavior: a dyadic analysis of salespeople and their customers. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 363-382.
Shanker, R.; Bhanugopan, R.; Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: the mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67-77.
Strauss, K.; Griffin, M. A.; Parker, S.K., & Mason, C. M. (2015). Building and sustaining proactive behaviors: the role of adaptivity and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 63-72.
Theworldbank (2018). Iran overview. accessed 24 may 2017. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran/overview.
Tsaur, S. H.; Hsu, F. S., & Lin, H. (2019). Workplace fun and work engagement in tourism and hospitality: The role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 131-140.
Verleye, K.; Gemmel, P., & Rangarajan, D. (2014). Managing engagement behaviors in a network of customers and stakeholders: evidence from the nursing home sector. Journal of Service Research, 17(1), 68-84.
Wilder, K. M.; Collier, J. E., & Barnes, D. C. (2014). Tailoring to customers’ needs: understanding how to promote an adaptive service experience with frontline employees. Journal of Service Research, 17(4), 446-459.
Woolley, L.; Caza, A., & Levy, L. (2011). Authentic leadership and follower development: psychological capital, positive work climate, and gender. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4), 438-448.
Woznyj, H. M.; Heggestad, E. D., Kennerly, S., & Yap, T. L. (2019). Climate and organizational performance in long‐term care facilities: The role of affective commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 122-143.
Yi, Y.; Gong, T., & Lee, H. (2013). The impact of other customers on customer citizenship behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 30(4), 341-356.
Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2013). Positive leadership: meaning and application across cultures. Organizational Dynamics, 42,198-208.
Zahed Babolan, A., & Karimianpour, Gh. (2018). The Effect of distributed leadership and psychological capital on commitment to change: the mediating role of self-efficacy of change. Transformation Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v10i2.65055. (In persion).