نوع مقاله : مقالات

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشگاه سمنان

3 پردیس البرز دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف دستیابی به نظریه‌ای در حوزه جامعه‌پذیری سازمانی در نظام بانکی ایران با استفاده از روش نظریه‌پردازی داده بنیاد صورت گرفته است. اهمیت پرداختن به موضوع جامعه‌پذیری سازمانی از آن رو است که با ارتقاء سازگاری کارکنان در سازمان و کسب مهارت‌های فنی و کارکردی مناسب، ضمن کارآمدشدن سازمان، کارکنان رضایت بیشتری را تجربه می‌نمایند. برای استخراج مؤلفه­های اصلی و تأثیرگذار بر جامعه‌پذیری کارکنان از مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته استفاده شده است و با 19 نفر از متخصصان حوزه منابع انسانی در نظام بانکی در سطح شهر تهران، با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند، مصاحبه عمیق به عمل آمد. در این پژوهش با استفاده از روش داده بنیاد، در مرحله کدگذاری باز، 49 مفهوم و 19 مقوله استخراج شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که برای رسیدن به یک مدل توسعه یافته از جامعه‌پذیری سازمانی در نظام بانکی ایران، باید آن را به عنوان یک فرایند مستمر و مداوم در نظر گرفت تا از رهگذر حمایت گری مدیران ارشد، مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی و فرهنگ‌سازمانی جامعه پذیر، ارزش‌ها و هنجارها و نقش‌های مورد انتظار از فرد به‌طور شفاف و مشخص، منتقل گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Developing an organizational socialization model for iranian banking system

چکیده [English]

Extended abstract
1-INTRODUCTION
The development of any society depends on both the performance of its organizations and individuals. When individuals join organizations, they must learn to understand and make sense of their new surroundings. organizational socialization is a process through which this sense-making occurs and an employee learns the required knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors to make a successful transition and adapt to the new job, role, or culture. socialization is one of the most important organizational processes that can minimize the shocks and tensions resulting from a contradiction between employees' expectations and job realities. it also reduces the amount of organizational financial losses and employees' demand for resignation. one of the main functions of organizations is making individuals sociable.


2-THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Organizational researchers seek to study the significant impacts of the effective socialization process. in the literature on human resource management, there exist different theories that, in a general classification, can be divided into process and content theories. the problem cannot always be found in the network of causal relationships of theories. the existing theories are originated in other communities, especially western countries of different cultural elements. therefore, a new theory is needed for developing the organizational socialization model in the banking system of iran. in this regard, using the grounded theory, the focus of this study was on finding the existing elements and their relationships in Iran's banking system.
3- METHODOLOGY
This research was a qualitative study accomplished by grounded theory. Needed data were collected by conducting in-depth interviews with human resource experts of the banking system located in Tehran. the sampling method was purposeful and the sampling procedure continued interview 19 to satisfy the theoretical saturation rule.
4-RESULT & DISCUSSION
The banking system should emphasize the organizational socialization processes to enable the employees to learn and adapt. additionally, it should provide employees with the required information and resources in exchange for their response to environmental changes. according to the results of grounded theory, 49 concepts and 19 categories were extracted in the stage of open coding. the emerged categories are as follows: organizational socialization, socialized organizational structure, supportive senior managers, organizational commitment, social responsibility, human resources dynamism, the stability of the existing human resource system, lack of desire for socialization, organizational apathy, work context, organizational culture, designing human resource processes, designing evaluation system, designing resources allocation system, succession planning, value creation, human resource development, competitiveness, and socializing fundamental management.
5-CONCLUSION & SUGGESTIONS
After developing the organizational socialization model for the banking system of Iran, the followings are suggested to enrich the existing socialization theories: to study the organizational socialization based on the current categorization dividing the banking system into public, private, semi-public, and semi-private; to conduct studies on components of organizational socialization comparing the public, private, semi-public, and semi-private banks; to study the intergenerational differences for organizational socialization in Iran's banking system; to conduct studies on organizational socialization components comparing the different internal and foreign organizations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational socialization
  • Banking System
  • Grounded theory
References
 Aguilera, R. V., & Dencker, J. C. (2006). Institutions & organizational socialization. Emerging Research Frontiers in international Business Studies, 2
Aref, H.; Seyedjavadin, R.; Pourezat, A. A., & Elyasi, G. M. (2019). Sensemaking: concept analysis and implications for human resource management. Journal of Public Administration. (in Persian)
Ashforth, B.; Sluss, D. M., & Saks, A. M. (2007). Socialization tactics, Proactive behavior & newcomer learning. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 73. July 1, 2007.
Bagues, E. (2012). Organizational socialization practice & organizational socialization tactics. workshop on research advances in organizational behavior & human resources management.
Bauer, T., & Erdogan, T. (2011). Organizational socialization: the effective onboarding of new employee. in: Zadek, s (Ed) Handbookin Psychology 3.
Bazargan, A. (2015). An introduction to qualitative and mixed methods research. Didar publication. (in Persian)
Beheshtifar, M.; Rashidi, M., & Nekoei-Moghadam, M. (2011). Study of organizational socialization and its relationship on employees' performance, African Journal of Business Management, 5(26).
Carr, J. C.; Pearson, A. W.; Vest, M. J., & Boyar, S. L. (2008). Prioroccupational experience, anticipatory socialization and employee retention”, Journal of management 32(3).
Chao, G. T. (2012). Organizational socialization: background, basics & a blueprint for adjustment at work. The Oxford handbook of organizational Psychology, 1.
Chao, T. C. (2002). Mentoring and organizational socialization:  networks for work adjustment, the handbook of mentoring at work:  theory, research and practice, 2007.
Coldwell, D. A.; Williamson, M., & Talbot, D. (2019). Organizational socialization and ethical fit: a conceptual development by serendipity. Personnel Review, 48(2), 511-527.
Cooper-Thomas et al., (2004). Changes in person organization fit. European Journal of work & organizational psychology 13(1), 52-78.
Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Anderson, N. (2006). Organizational socialization a new theoretical model & recommendations for future research & H. R. M proctices in organiations, Journal of Managemerial Psychology, 2(5). pp. 492-516.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 1990.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2004). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, http://doi.org.
Danaeefard, H.; Alvani, S. M., & Azar, A. (2016). Qualitative research methodology in management: comprehensive approach. Saffar Publication. (in Persian)
Desmidt, S., & Prinzie, A. (2019). Establishing a mission-based culture: analyzing the relation between intra-organizational socialization agents, mission valence, public service motivation, goal clarity and work impact. International Public Management Journal, 22(4), 664-690
Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of management review, 6.
Fisher, C. D. (1986). Organizational socialization: an integrative review. in K. Ronald & G. Feris, (Eds) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 4, Greenwich, CT: JAL.
Fong, R.; Duff, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2011). The organizational socialization process: review & development of a social capital model. Journal of Management 37(1), 127-152.
Griffin, C., & Goparaju, (2000). Newcomer & organizational socialization tactivs: an interactionist perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 10(40).
Homans, George, C. (1974). Social behavior as exchange. Amerian Journal of Sociology, 63 May 1985.
Hornsey, M., & Jetten, O. (2004). The Individual within the group. Personality & Social Psychology Review.
Jankins, R. (2000). Categorizations: identity, social process & epistemology. International Sociological Association, july 2000.
Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustment to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262-279.
Kammeyer, M., & Wanberg, J. D. (2003). Unwrapping the organizational entry process: disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathway to adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5).
Khaki, G. (2012). Research method with grounded theory approach. Foozhan publication. (in Persian)
Louise, M. R. (1980). Surprise & sense-making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25.
Morrison, E. W. (1993). Longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: pp. 173-183.
Nelson, D., & Quick, J. (1991). Social support & newcomer adjustment in organizations: attachment theory at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, pp. 543-554.
Nikpour, A.; Chamanifard, R., & Rajaeenejad, M. (2012). The role of employee socialization on organizational effectiveness & efficiency. Journal of Work & Society. 150, Nov. 2012. (in Persian)
Ozdemir, Y., & Ergum, S. (2015). The Relationship between organizational socialization and organizational citizenship behavior: The Mediating Role of Person-Environment fit, Procedia Social & Behavioral Science, 207 (2015).
Rooshani, K. (2015). Survey the relationship between organizational socialization & organizational commitment. International conference in management, Economy & Accounting. (in Persian)
Saks, A.; Ashforth, M., & Blake, E. (1997). Organizational socialization: making sense of the past & present as a prologue for thr future. Journal of Vocational Behavior 51, pp. 234-279
Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement? Human Resource Development Quarterly 25(2). June 2014.
Saunders, M.; Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2000). Research methods for business students. London: Printice Hall.
Schott, C.; Steen, T., & Van Kleef, D. D. (2019). Reality shock and public service motivation: a longitudinal, qualitative study among dutch veterinary inspectors. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(6), 468-481.
Shaw, J. D.; Gupta. N., & Delery, J. E., (2005). Alternative conceptualization of the relationship between voluntary turn over & organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(1).
Soltanzadeh, V., & Ghalavandi, H. (2013). Study of career anchors of facultymembers of Urmia University & its relationship with organizational socialization, 9(2), summer 2013. (in Persian)
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures & techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications.
Taormina, R. J. (1997). Organizational socialization: a multidomain, continuous process model. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 1. January 1997.
Vanmannen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Towarda theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior. 1, pp. 209-246. Greenwich, C. T: JAI Press.