نوع مقاله : مقالات

نویسندگان

چکیده

هوش سازمانی از چالش های اساسی سازمان های نوآور امروز است که به کارگیری آن در دانشگاه های دولتی کشور نیز امری ضروری به نظر می رسد. به همین دلیل دستیابی به مدلی علت و معلولی، که ابعاد و مؤلفه های مختلف هوش سازمانی دانشگاه-های دولتی ایران را تبیین کند، در این پژوهش مورد توجه قرار گرفت. ازاین رو، با بررسی ادبیات موضوع، ابعاد و مؤلفه های هوش سازمانی استخراج شد و با استفاده از نظرات خبرگان دانشگاهی، ابعاد و مؤلفه های آن در دانشگاه های دولتی ایران احصا و مدلی مفهومی تدوین گردید. سپس با استفاده از روش دیماتل روابط بین ابعاد و مؤلفه های این مدل مشخص و شبکه روابط به صورتی یکپارچه صورت بندی و مدلی تحلیلی طراحی شد که بیانگر شدت اثر ابعاد و مؤلفه ها بر هم می باشد. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهند هوش سازمانی دانشگاه های دولتی ایران، شامل هشت بعد است که هریک از این ابعاد، خود دارای چند مؤلفه (جمعاً 36 مؤلفه) می باشند. این ابعاد عبارتند از: ساختاری، فرهنگی، راهبردی، ارتباطی، اطلاعاتی، فرآیندی، رفتاری و محیطی. ابعاد محیطی، ساختاری، اطلاعاتی، فرهنگی و راهبردی، گروه علت ها (اثرگذارها) و ابعاد ارتباطی، فرآیندی و رفتاری، گروه معلول ها (اثرپذیرها) را تشکیل می دهند. روابط میان مؤلفه های هریک از این ابعاد نیز به نوبه خود بررسی و مدل های علت و معلولی آنها طراحی شد. با توجه به 36 مؤلفه مدل، پرسشنامه ای طراحی گردید که برای اندازه گیری نیم رخ هوش سازمانی دانشگاه های دولتی کشور قابل استفاده می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

- Albrecht, K. (2003). The power of minds at work: organizational intelligence in action. AMACOM, New York.
- Ambrosiadou, B. V., & Goulis, D. G. (1999). The delphi method as a consensus and knowledge acquisition tool for the evaluation of the diabetes system for insulin administration. Medical Informatics Journal, 24(4), 257-268
- Asgharpour, M. (2004). Group decision making and game theory. Tehran, Tehran university publication. (in Persian)
- Boal, K. B., & Whitehead, C. J. (1992). A critique and extension of thestratified systems theory perspective. in Phillips, R. L., & Hunt, J. G., eds. Strategic leadership: a multi organizational perspective. Quorum Books, westport, CT, 237–254.
- Cakir, R., & Ada, S. (2008). Can the organizational intelligence be developed in schools by in-service training? World Applied Sciences Journal, 4(1), 24-30.
- Choo, C. W. (1998). Information management for the intelligent organization. information Today, Medford, NJ.
- Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2004). Organizational development and change. 8th ed., Thomson South western.
- Daft, R. L. (2005). Organization theory & design. Translated by: Parsayan, A., & Arabi, M., Tehran, cultural research bureau. (in Persian).
- Erçetin, S.; Çetin B., & Potas N. (2007). Multi-dimensional organizational intelligence scale (muldimorins). World Appl. Sci. J. 2(3), 151-157.
- Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1081-111
- Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books, New York, NY.
- Gottfredson, L. S. (1998). The general factor of intelligence. Scientific American, IX(4), 24-29.
- Green, C. G.; Khan, M. A., & Badinelli, R. (1993). Use of the Delphi research technique to test a decision model in foodservice systems: a case study in food production. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 93(11), 1307.
- Halal , W. E. (2006). Organizationali intelligence. Melcrum publishing ltd. Halal, E. W., & Kull, M. D. (1998). Measuring organizational intelligence. - Aurburn Horizon. From: http://www.aurbum.edu/administration/horizon / measuring.html
- Hall, R. (2006). Organizations. Translated by: Parsayan, A. & Arabi, M., Tehran, cultural research bureau. (in Persian)
- Hasson, F.; Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015.
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture consequences: international differences in work- related values. London, Sage publications
- Howe, M. (1998). Intelligence as explanation. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 349-60
- Jamali, G. H.; Ebrahimi, M., & Abbaszadeh, M. A. (2010). TQM implementation: an investigation of critical success factors. International conference on education and management technology, Cairo, Egypt.
- Kafetsios, K. (2003). Attachment and emotional intelligence abilities across the life course. Personality and Individual Differences Journal, 37(1), 129-145.
- Kohansal, H.; Saatchi, M., & Javidi, H. (2010). Organizational intelligence indices review, Psychological Methods and Models Journal, 1(1). (in Persian)
- Kull, D. M. (2000). Organizational intelligence: measuring cognitive resources to improve performance. from http://www.gwis2.circ.gwu.edu
- Ludwig, L., & Starr, S. (2005). Library as place: results of a Delphi study. Journal of Medical Library Association, 93(3), 315-326.
- Mac Gilchrist, B. & Kand Reed, J. (1997). The intelligence school. London: Paul Chapman publishing
- Matheson, D., & Matheson, J. (1998). The smart organization: creating value through strategic R&D. Boston: Harvard business school press.
- Matsuda, T. (1992). Organizational intelligence: It's significance as a process and as a product. proceedings of the international conference on economics, management and information technology, Tokyo, Japan.
- McMaster, M. D. (1998). Organizational intelligence. from: www.kbdworld.demon.co.uk
- Mendelson, M., & Ziegler, J. (1999). Survival of the smartest; managing information for rapid action and world-class performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons Press
- Meriam - Webster (2012). Dictionary from: http://www.merriam-webster.com
- Minch, P. R. (1996). Hypermedia knowledge management for intelligent organizations. In R. W. Blanning & D. R. King, Organizational intelligence all in organizational design, modeling and control. Los Alamitos, California
- Newman, F. (2000). Saving higher education’s soul. The futures project: policy for higher education in a changing world. Brown university, Providence, Rhode Island
- Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management Journal, 42(1), 15-30.
- Prejmerean, M., & Vasilache, S. (2008). University’s organizational intelligence: standards, strategies and debouches. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(5), 151-164.
- Prejmerean, M. (2007). Universities in the free-market economy: strategies for their marketing. Revista de Management si Inginerie Economica, 6(4).
- Salimifard, K.; Abbaszadeh, M. A., & Ghorbanpur, A. (2010). Interpretive structural modeling of critical success factors in banking process re-engineering. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(2), 95-103. (in Persian)
- Schwaninger, M. (2003). A cybernetic model to enhance organizational intelligence. Systems Analysis Model Simulation Journal, 43(1), 53-65.
- Shermerhorn, Jr. J. (2011). Exploring management. Wiley and Sons (Asia).
- Shermerhorn, Jr. J. (2011). Introduction to management. Wiley and Sons (Asia).
- Shieh, J.; Wu, H., & Huang, K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems Journal, 23(4), 277-282
- Tzeng, G. H.; Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2006). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications Journal, 32(4), 1028–1044.
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1998). Higher education in the twenty-first century vision and action, World conference on higher education
- Web, C., & Williams, P. (1994). The delphi technique: a methodological discussion. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(1), 180–186.
- Wilensky, H. (1997). Organizational intelligence. Basic Books, New York, NY.
- Williams, W. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Group intelligence: why some groups are better than others. Intelligence Journal, 12(4), 351-377.
- Zar, J. H. (1999). Bio statistical analysis. 4th Ed. Upper saddle river, New Jersey: prentice hall
CAPTCHA Image