References
Bigley, G., & Roberts, K. (2014). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1281-1299.
Chassin, M., & Loeb, M. (2017). High-reliability health care: Getting there from here. The Milbank Quarterly, 91(3), 459-490.
Gebauer, A. (2013). Mindful organizing as a paradigm to develop managers. Journal of Management Education, 37(2), 203-228.
Ghazi Tabatabaei, M. (2001). Process of gathering, implement and interpretation of a lisrel model outputs: an objective example. Research & Evaluation in Social & Behavioral Science of Allameh Tabatabaee University, 1, 85-125. (in Persian)
Giles, D. V. (2002). Advanced research methods in psychology. First published 2002 by Routledge.
Hooman, H. A. (2011). Multivariate data analysis in scientific research. Tehran: Parsa. (in Persian)
Hooman, H. A. (2016). Structural equation modeling with LISREL application. Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
Hopkins, A. (2008). The problem of defining high reliability organisations. National research center for OHS regulation.
http://www.efcog.org/wg/ism_pmi/docs/safety_culture/hopkins_defining_hros.pdf
Koch, B. A. (1993). Differentiating reliability-seeking organizations from other organizations: development and validation of an assessment device. in K. H. Roberts (Ed.), New challenges to understanding organizations (pp. 75-97). New York: Macmillan.
Koller, O. (2001). Mathematical worldviews and achievement in advanced mathematics in Germany: findings from Timss population 3. Studies in Educational Evaluations, 27(1), 65-78.
Langeland, K.; Manheim, D.; McLeod, G., & Nacouzi, G. (2016). How civil institutions build resilience. RAND Corporation.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 10.7249/j. ctt1btc0m7.9
Lee Chu, P. W. (2008). Using mixed methods to identify high reliability organization measures for local health department disaster preparedness. a dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of doctor of public health in public health in the graduate division of the university of california, berkeley.
O'Neil, P., & Krane, D. (2015). Policy and organizational change in the federal aviation administration: the ontogenesis of a high-reliability organization. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 98-111.
Phan, H., & Walker, R. (2000). The predicting and meditational role of mathematics self-efficacy: a path analysis.
http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2000/pha00224.pdf
Roberts, K. H. (1990). Managing High Reliability Organizations. California Management Review, 32(4), 101-113.
Roberts, K. H.; Madsen, P.; Desai, V., & Van Stralen, D. (2005). A case of the birth and death of a high reliability healthcare organization. Qual Saf Health Care, 14(3), 216-220.
Sarmad, Z.; Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2017). Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Agah. (in Persian)
Veil, R. (2014). Mindful learning in crisis management. Journal of Business Communication, 48(2), 116-147.
Weick, K. E.; Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness source: R.S. sutton & B.M. staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, volume 1 (stanford: jai press, 1999, pp. 81-123). in crisis management volume III edited by arjen boin (2008). sage publications Ltd.
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2008). Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. (Second Edition). By John Wiley & Sons, Inc. San Francisco.
Weick, K. E. (2012). Errors in organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(1), 159- 165.
Werner, J. (2012). High reliability organization theory as an input to manage operational risk in project management. master of science in organizational dynamics at the university of pennsylvania.
Wolf, E. J.; Harrington, K. M.; Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913-934.
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله